English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

I thought when the United States invaded Iraq WWW III had started. However, I now know that historical event was a hallmark to the current escalation of violence.
Examine the SCOPE of muslim radical fundamentalism (the name does not deserve to capitalized). These terrorists are imbedded in every country around the globe, especially in Europe, with the belief of conversion or death to all. When formulating your own opinion about your question, keep in mind the recent reaction to terrorism by France and Spain in contrast to the reaction by the United States of America and Israel. Why are Russia and China content on supporting ineffective United Nation resolutions and bogus negotiations with rogue terrorist factions/states?
One must also take into consideration the Geographical locations of these countries involved in the current conflict and ask the question, "How would this situation be different if the United States did not have troops in Iraq?" Israel would be facing threats from Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Turkey.
There are many clowns in the media who put their own spin on issues and feed it to the public by misreporting, omitting facts, or adding personal responses to the news to influence opinions in order to “change the world.” Filter these charlatans with the question, “What does nuclear proliferation mean in 2006?” I challenge you to research the true COMPLETE HISTORY of conflict between the Muslims and Israelis, the rise and fall of Hitler and fascism in WWII, and Sun Tzu’s “The Art of War”. Then answer your own question. The Muslim religion is not a religion of peace, neither is Christianity or Judaism. History is repeating itself.

2006-07-16 16:50:45 · answer #1 · answered by joe 3 · 2 0

I think it very well may be. With our heads buried in the sand, Korea is silently planning some kind of attack on some country. While Israel has nukes and so do many others. It is a scary thought that there could be another world war. It is even scarier that this one could possibly be fought on our own soil. If we would keep our noses out of other countries business, there wouldn't be all this chaos. Same goes for out "do as we say, not as we do" attitude. Bush is not the president of earth. Just the US. Hopefully some one in our government thinks like the real people in this country and takes a stand before something else horrible happens.

2006-07-16 15:44:56 · answer #2 · answered by Angela M 1 · 0 0

Hatred is getting stronger and WWW3 is not being fought like any other war. Terrorist attacks can hit around the world and you don't know who does the bombing until it is done if you know then. Terrorism is a dirty type of war fought by individuals who believe it an honor and privilege to die for their cause and even stoop to using little children to carry out their plans. We are sleeping if we don't know that it has already started. Just when it will escalate is another matter.

2006-07-16 15:50:07 · answer #3 · answered by # one 6 · 0 0

I am afraid it very well could be.
There have been world wars faught over much less.
Every country it seems is involved in a war someplace.
When Isreal is attacked, it has a nuclear bomb
that is the only reason they are still alive.
Becuase the other islamic countries don't.
If they are forced to use it and now pakstan has a bomb
this is definitely a world crissis.

2006-07-16 15:24:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Please try to understand. A "World War" requires all sides to be equal participants in the conflict. What we're seeing now is simple posturing by the Zionists against weak, insignificant little governments to cover for their implementation of a one world government. Once China and the West begin exchanging nuclear blows, then it will be a "World War".

2006-07-16 15:30:17 · answer #5 · answered by Doc Holiday 3 · 0 0

Nobody wants a war, especially a WW3. There will be a long fight for dipolmacy before that happens. The international community will put alot of pressure on Israel and Lebanon before that happens.

B/c of that, I believe it's very unlikely.

2006-07-16 15:27:19 · answer #6 · answered by Cherry 3 · 0 0

I will say the beginning. You see we just don't know what the Arabs have to defend themselves now the Cold war is over and Russia has sold it's weapons to the highest bidder.

2006-07-16 15:25:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's perhaps the worst case scenario that you can think of, but I think it's pretty darn unlikely

2006-07-16 15:23:12 · answer #8 · answered by duffman071 4 · 0 0

I sure hope not since major powers are involve yet

2006-07-16 15:23:57 · answer #9 · answered by davi h 3 · 0 0

I think so but I think things have been builing up to it for decades now.

2006-07-16 17:05:31 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers