English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush helps cut the C.I.A's hunt for Bin Laden task force.

Hamas and Hezbollah have both killed more Americans then Al-Qeada, and way more then Saddam. (which includes both gulf wars) yet no real funding for war against these more deadly terrorist groups.

Iran and Syria involved in more hostage taking and American killing then Saddam and every terrorist orginization combined.

Bush and the office of home land security named a donkey as a terrorist target. They named a small Indiana out house as a terrorist target. And they got millions in funding!!!

Bush says he doesn't "care about Bin Laden, he doesn't even cross my mind".

Who thinks Bush is doing a horrible job on terrorism?

P.S Al-Qeada waits for years to plan their attacks so don't use the old "we haven't been hit since 9/11" routine. We still got a few more years to go.

2006-07-16 15:07:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Any foiled attack was not a planning from Bin Laden. These are goof ball groups who aren't professional. Or as the daily show likes to call the last group "seven morons in a warehouse"

2006-07-16 15:16:26 · update #1

Did I mention Bush was going tohand over our port security to country's linked to terrorism.

2006-07-16 15:18:09 · update #2

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/270606sevenretards.htm

2006-07-16 15:24:00 · update #3

10 answers

think about your average school yard bully,,,, except he has the worlds greatest military to play with,,, that's George W Bush

2006-07-16 15:11:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Oh for the love of Christmas... once again you make things up and post it as indisputable facts.

Why don't you back up your assertions with links to credible websites. The one link you have is to an entertainment website, and you do know that the Daily Show is a comedy show, not a news journal.

How is Bush doing on terror... pretty good, when is the last time the US was hit by terrorism? Bush has kept the pressure on terrorists by preventing them from effectively communicating. Bin Laden can crouch in his cave all day, but when push comes to shove your President, George Bush, has rendered Al Qeada ineffective.

And as an aside... the whole port security issue was never a threat to national security. Allowing P&O to operate the ports would have been no different than allowing a foreign airline to operate at a US airport. Security is provided by US Customs and other federal agencies, not the shipping company. And by the way... P&O had been hiring hundreds of Americans to work at those ports, so the US was hurt hard by knee jerk liberals who listen to the Daily Show and CNN instead of actually troubling themselves to learn the truth.

2006-07-17 06:21:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush helped free 27 million people from a tyrant, Where were you when Clinton did nothing when the world trade centers were attacked in 93, and Al qaeda was and still is in Iraq, Iraq had wmds and some were found but The mainstream media has got pinheads like you to believe every thing they say even if it means hoping we lose this war so you can blame it on Bush. Your so narrow minded that you forgot that you live in the greatest country on earth. If you just visited a communist country for one day you would kiss the ground you live on when you got back. How about instead of spending all your energy criticizing this president and this country, why don't you come up with some ideas if your so smart other than cut and run. You talk about Hamas and Hezbollah being so bad, you just watch and see how fast all this is blamed on Isreal and Bush. Face it Bush won the election twice, because people like you don't have any ideas other than that fits a cowards perpective.

2006-07-16 15:30:04 · answer #3 · answered by Go Rush! 3 · 0 0

"P.S Al-Qeada waits for years to plan their attacks so don't use the old "we haven't been hit since 9/11" routine. We still got a few more years to go."

Bush was in office for 9 months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office for 8 years. Based on your own statement that would make Clinton culpable for 9-11. Guess we know who was doing a horrible job on terrorism don't we?

2006-07-16 15:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So.... Obama fought tooth and nail against going to conflict - each and every danger he gets he claims "speaking to them" will choose the concern - He close down 4 substantial defense force structures - and tried to close down GITMO it somewhat is the placement we rather gained the intelligence on the placement Bin laden became hiding - yet now he's without observe some great defense force chief??? WHAT A shaggy canine tale! the only venture I grant him credit for is right no longer putting forward no on a similar time as the possibility to kill Bin laden became provided. Now grant me a thumbs down reason you haven't any longer have been given any further any reaction and drink up that Kool-Ade! Edit: Get your head out of Obama's Hoo Ha! in case you think of of that Iraq had no longer some thing to do with Al Queda you have your head buried deep! What occurred to ALL that intelligence Clinton had on a similar time as he had missile strikes against Iraq? Did they without observe in basic terms bypass away? And talk approximately getting an education. That wasn't the only reason we went to conflict with Iraq. attempt 17 UN resolutions. yet no... your precise. Iraqi's are no longer somewhat properly worth liberating. they had a dazzling life before we've been given there. in basic terms ask any of their women human beings.... in the event that they are allowed to have an opinion.

2016-12-10 08:26:41 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Its just not the big guys we have to go after, and i dont think anyone is really a terrorist expert except for terrorist. I also didnt see clinton have the balls to go after them. Someone had to do it . I dont belive in everything that bush does but i do have faith in the troops and the president in time of war. He is a politician but he is also a man.

2006-07-16 15:16:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your P.S. comment is incorrect. There have been many foiled plans inside of our country. And that is a fact. And I would say the government( I don't see how you can blame everything on Bush, he is one of three branches of the government.) is doing a good job inside the U.S. borders. The world plans may have let a little to be desired though.

2006-07-16 15:13:07 · answer #7 · answered by takeashot30 4 · 0 0

it's because bush is not concerned about who is dying in this world all he is concerned about is who is putting money in his pocket and who is holding the money back from being put in his pocket. he's a moron he became president to finish the fight his father had started with sadaam.. he's mad because sadaam had more money and more power in his country than bush will ever have in this country. hes envious of sadaam. and bin laden doesnt cross his mind because thats his partner in business. they work hand in hand. bush probably has bin laden sleeping in the white house bush is a terrorist.. i would lock him up for treason if i ever became president. HAHA.

2006-07-18 12:48:26 · answer #8 · answered by rockdstarchick 2 · 0 0

He's terrible, but there is no such thing as a war on terrorism!! How do you know when you won?

But you are right, we never went after the terrorist, we went to war in Iraq over oil!!!

2006-07-16 15:14:03 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

OH SHUT UP YOU MORON> !!!!!

2006-07-16 15:09:55 · answer #10 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers