Apparently, Leonardo daVinci deliberately altered texture, or paint composition or something like that so that Mona Lisa's smile would appear differently when viewed from the left and from the right. Also, whether or not this is related to what i said before, artsy people think that it is the one of the best painted smiles aver because it makes her appear as if she knows something you don't.
2006-07-16 13:13:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by blacksheepmatt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, its no longer. i found this mannerist portray on wikipedia as quickly as, the portray is relatively comparable in lots of techniques, The history, the commonplace temper, and the girl's have been given a captivating smile too. and observing it, it extremely does not make any sense why monalisa became chosen for that smile component.
2016-12-14 08:52:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look at what the Louvre have to say about her.
This portrait was doubtless painted in Florence between 1503 and 1506. It is thought to be of Lisa Gherardini, wife of a Florentine cloth merchant named Francesco del Giocondo - hence the alternative title, La Gioconda. However, Leonardo seems to have taken the completed portrait to France rather than giving it to the person who commissioned it. It was eventually returned to Italy by Leonardo's student and heir Salai. It is not known how the painting came to be in François I's collection.
Description
Lisa Gherardini, wife of Francesco Giocondo
The history of the Mona Lisa is shrouded in mystery. Among the aspects which remain unclear are the exact identity of the sitter, who commissioned the portrait, how long Leonardo worked on the painting, how long he kept it, and how it came to be in the French royal collection.
The portrait may have been painted to mark one of two events - either when Francesco del Giocondo and his wife bought their own house in 1503, or when their second son, Andrea, was born in December 1502 after the death of a daughter in 1499. The delicate dark veil that covers Mona Lisa's hair is sometimes considered a mourning veil. In fact, such veils were commonly worn as a mark of virtue. Her clothing is unremarkable. Neither the yellow sleeves of her gown, nor her pleated gown, nor the scarf delicately draped round her shoulders are signs of aristocratic status.
A new artistic formula
The Mona Lisa is the earliest Italian portrait to focus so closely on the sitter in a half-length portrait. The painting is generous enough in its dimensions to include the arms and hands without them touching the frame. The portrait is painted to a realistic scale in the highly structured space where it has the fullness of volume of a sculpture in the round. The figure is shown in half-length, from the head to the waist, sitting in a chair whose arm is resting on balusters. She is resting her left arm on the arm of the chair, which is placed in front of a loggia, suggested by the parapet behind her and the two fragmentary columns framing the figure and forming a "window" looking out over the landscape. The perfection of this new artistic formula explains its immediate influence on Florentine and Lombard art of the early 16th century. Such aspects of the work as the three-quarter view of a figure against a landscape, the architectural setting, and the hands joined in the foreground were already extant in Flemish portraiture of the second half of the 15th century, particularly in the works of Hans Memling. However, the spacial coherence, the atmospheric illusionism, the monumentality, and the sheer equilibrium of the work were all new. In fact, these aspects were also new to Leonardo's work, as none of his earlier portraits display such controlled majesty.
An emblematic smile
The Mona Lisa's famous smile represents the sitter in the same way that the juniper branches represent Ginevra Benci and the ermine represents Cecilia Gallerani in their portraits, in Washington and Krakow respectively. It is a visual representation of the idea of happiness suggested by the word "gioconda" in Italian. Leonardo made this notion of happiness the central motif of the portrait: it is this notion which makes the work such an ideal. The nature of the landscape also plays a role. The middle distance, on the same level as the sitter's chest, is in warm colors. Men live in this space: there is a winding road and a bridge. This space represents the transition between the space of the sitter and the far distance, where the landscape becomes a wild and uninhabited space of rocks and water which stretches to the horizon, which Leonardo has cleverly drawn at the level of the sitter's eyes.
2006-07-18 06:06:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by samanthajanecaroline 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's like any other smile, but it seems somebody made a lot of money out of saying that it was different. Maybe the artist was telling her a joke, so that she would smile the way he wanted. Who knows?
2006-07-16 13:07:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ricardocoav 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The smile is enigmatic. One becomes intrigued to know what she is thinking. The manifold possibilities draw us into an artificial relationship with her. We are no longer just looking at a picture. We are appreciating...something.
2006-07-16 16:00:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you notice, one side is smiling, and the other is vaguely frowning. There are several theories why this is true, from she had a toothache, to she was contemplating taking a lover.
2006-07-17 04:40:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Leonardo did something nasty and Mona had to smile like that.
2006-07-16 13:39:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Leprechaun 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a smile that is almost nonexistent and she looks like she has a secret
2006-07-16 15:57:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Elizabeth L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
mona lisa smiles as if she knows a secret, one that no one else does. it seems that she is hiding smthin ,which was exactly how leonardo intended it to be!
2006-07-17 06:28:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the same reason people care about Tom/Kat...the celebrity bandwagon only more highbrow than hollywood art(ists).
2006-07-16 13:41:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋