English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

bush has WMDs and has a nice comfy relationship with Israel, he won't stand up to them. Blair is hankering after Britain's own WMDs too. As for Iran I believe they have peaceful purposes for their nuclear technology. Or else they need to defend themselves from attacks from Israel and the U.S.

2006-07-16 12:36:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I wouldn't be surprised if Iran had the WMD's that Iraq kept in stock. I bet Saddam had his deadly weapons sent to surrounding countries and I bet some of those countries don't even know it. Think of all the land that not a soul goes near, right on Iraq's border.
Anyway, if he'd let the weapons inspectors do their job, there would have been no reason for any invasion.

2006-07-16 13:03:47 · answer #2 · answered by foxymangray 2 · 0 0

Bush or Blair stand up to Israel? You have to be kidding. Israel runs America, Bush runs Blair

2006-07-16 12:36:14 · answer #3 · answered by Ferret 5 · 0 0

Your question is a reflection of the reason these issue are out there. You cannot resolve the problem by looking at one side.

If my family and your family have issues, the problem could not be resolved by considering my family only, neither could it be resolved by considering your family.

Both families have to have the issue resolved in a way that BOTH families agree, other wise the issue will remain and only ugliness will be festered.

What gives America the right to have WMD and then tell other countries that they cannot have them. America has invade more countries since world war two than any other country!

2006-07-16 12:41:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the US and Britain are back Israel 100% (if thats what your asking) and i dont think Iran or N Korea would be dumb enuff to attack Isral, the US, Britain or any of our major allies because it would start a world war

2006-07-16 12:35:03 · answer #5 · answered by 2MINELLO 2 · 0 0

I think they are both afraid of those crazy North Koreans, Iran we could wipe out pretty easily, but they are probably starting to realize that we are spreading ourselves pretty thing and weaking our defenses on the homefront. We are making ourselves vulnerable to others and losing our superpower status.

2006-07-16 12:35:14 · answer #6 · answered by Swede 3 · 0 0

Bush(g.w.) is in america-- well, he will be when he gets back home. Blair will soon be in britan.. They will both stand coutinuously WITH Isreal till the war on terror is over.. Who do you stand with, or for..

2006-07-16 12:38:46 · answer #7 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0 0

I think tony blair because america is ruled by jewish but england not like america

2006-07-16 12:35:10 · answer #8 · answered by The prince of persia 1 · 0 0

they are currently in russia for a G8 meeting

2006-07-16 13:25:27 · answer #9 · answered by Als 2 · 0 0

STAND UP TO ISRAEL???? OH BROTHER.

2006-07-16 12:38:21 · answer #10 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers