English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He's mentioned it several times and now there's been mention of letting him serve a third term to "straighten out this mess Bill Clinton got us into".
Would you "lay down" for this , too?

2006-07-16 10:50:29 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

If any of you dispute his statements, merely type in George W Bush dictator on any website then look under video. You can witness his statements on video.

2006-07-16 11:01:46 · update #1

20 answers

He already thinks he is... He thinks he is above the law and seems to have little regard for the constitution.

2006-07-16 10:54:49 · answer #1 · answered by Heatmizer 5 · 0 1

Are you a total retard.

When did Bush mention being our dictator???

You are an idiot.

By the way, during World War II, Roosevelt served four terms, even though no previous president had served more than two. It was not law at that time, only a precedent set by George Washington.

Anyway, modern Americans are the most retarded people in the history of the world.

Any little thing that happens and you go on like the world is falling apart.

Hitler killed millions of people in concentration camps and George Bush hasn't put anybody in a concentration camp, but there is no lack of loonies who compare the two.

Bush has us in a war that has led to the death of about 2500 servicemen, and people act like the sky is falling.

Abraham Lincoln involved the United States in a war that led to the death of tens of thousands upon tens of thousands of Union soldiers, and many Northerners were questioning at the time why there sons and husbands were dying to preserve a union and to end a practice of slavery that they didn't really care about.

There was considerable outcry against Grant for his ruthless sacrifice of American soldiers to bring the South to surrender.

Today we hold up Lincoln as an angel, but in his day her was regarded by many as a tyrant.

Get real people.

There have been wars since the beginning of time, and this is about as small a war as there can be.

There have also been many real tyrants throughout the course of history that destroyed people's lives by throwing them in prison, allowing their soldiers and secret service people to rape wives and daughters, Exercising total control over all media outlets, just like Bush has done with CBS, and NBC, and ABC, and CNN, yep that is exactly what he has done.

People like Napoleon used French sons and husbands to fulfill his vision to conquer the world and Alexander the Great did the same.

Until you stop being an idiot and get some perspective, you should really shut the f*ck up.

2006-07-16 18:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh geez.....would you stop being so paranoid? There is a difference between a dictatorship and a democracy. If this was a dictatorship, ALL war protestors would've been shot and executed by now.

No one's being rounded up and put into camps and where are the paramilitary groups that go and terrorize innocent people? I don't see any. Have some common sense.

You don't have to like Dubya, just wait out the rest of the term like everyone else. Hopefully John McCain will be our next president or maybe Condi.

2006-07-16 18:04:08 · answer #3 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 0 0

There was talk of Bill Clinton taking a third term also but it would have required another constitutional amendment to serve more than eight (or ten, in a few cases) years in office.

God help us if Hillary gets elected.

Only one man could have served as many times as he got elected after the term limits were instituted but he's dead now.

2006-07-16 17:57:16 · answer #4 · answered by azespero 3 · 0 0

No Way, should any President be allowed to stay in office longer than two Terms. Considering all the damage done by each President 2 terms is more than enough. Now we can have different Representatives from the same party hold an office. Same Values different person. That way no one person can be blamed. It was the Right/Left, Democrat's/Republicans fault..

2006-07-16 17:58:28 · answer #5 · answered by majic2u 2 · 0 0

Is it okay if I just make stuff up, too? Okay, here goes.

George Bush actually answers to the plaid men who live in the moon. Karl Rove is actually one of the plaid men in disguise. The plaid men actually removed Bush's brain and replaced it with a plain-man brain. It's because the synapses don't quite work the same that he seems to have some trouble with his public speaking.

Oh, yeah, and George Bush blew up the Hindenburg, killed Kennedy, blew up the space shuttle, poisoned Elvis, and shot down Amelia Earhart.

2006-07-16 17:56:13 · answer #6 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0 0

Baby BUSH needs a 3rd term only if...and I mean ONLY IF...he and ALL of his family members AND supporters can serve the full term in IRAQ!
If there's a movement to make him a dictator, then I'm all in favor of him being dispatched to Iraq to DICTATE the mess that he and his daddy started!
In fact...BUSH and ALL of his supporters (here and abroad) should be forced to go to Iraq and fight against the insurgents...since it's such a noble cause and everything!

2006-07-16 18:03:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i would be about as likely to lay down for bush being a dictator as he would to support a pro-gay marriage amendment. bill clinton didnt get us into a mess, he left with a budget surplus and giving the us a great foreign image. bush f***ed it up, not clinton. f*** bush, hes a crappy president, i dont want to see how the world would end up if he didnt have anybody to answer to (not that he acts like it now...).

2006-07-16 17:54:06 · answer #8 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 0 0

No, no, and no. I would personally start the Constitutional Lawsuit, and then I would definitey move to a different Country if I lost. Like the Indian Reservation.

2006-07-16 17:53:59 · answer #9 · answered by ce1n 2 · 0 0

I would hope not. Dictatorships tend to be best at the beginning. W seems more like the result of a dictatorship not the cause of one. The Armed Forces would remove him from power if he were to try it, I have great confidence in this.

2006-07-16 17:53:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dictators usually aren't voted for. since the MAJORITY of people voted for bush 2 times already, i say let them decide again, this IS a democracy

2006-07-16 17:54:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers