Why would anyone care about people in Lebanon dying?
After all, all they HAVE TO DO IS KICK OUT THE F*CKING TERRORISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh, and "blair doesn't ""fall out of line"" with bush" bush has him better trained than that! roflmao
2006-07-16 10:43:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by AdamKadmon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, since Bush doesn't condone innocent civilians dying in Lebanon, I don't know why Blair agreeing with him would mean that the UK does either.
Sometimes, a thing is right even if Bush does it.
2006-07-16 10:43:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steve W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Kim Howells criticism of Israel is to placate the British Public over Blairs stand with Bush. Blair will aplogise to Bush and tell him Howell is a loose canon. Whatever happens Blair is still Bushes poodle. Furthermore When Blair retires he will earn millions on the US lecture circuit. He will do nothing to jeopodise that potential income!
2016-03-27 07:58:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Toe the line????
what people in the UK??
Well let's all support Lebanon and Iran then shall we? and while were about it why not support Iraq and Afganistan!!!
There friends and Blair is doing what he think's is right...I'm from the UK by the way.
2006-07-16 10:55:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Viv C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
look get this straight bush is always going to be right,to support him is a must ,if any country wants to get any were,to side with the right ,and get rid of those evil do,ers is a must .first you cant be one of the evil do,ers if you side with bush .so be proud what a union Blair and bush,dont forget the Israel,s too ,must have support for them too. if the TV news is not good one can just turn it of and make it go away,back to work ,pay taxes and repent.
2006-07-16 11:36:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by CIVILIAN 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
what u should know is that Is real is a baby project of the united nations created in 1948 based on biblical history.this infuriated the Arab world who believe in Islamic interpretation on the holy land.and as such,Blair being one of the big voices in the christian world must always fell into the line again by siding bush on the crises based on christian patriotic principles.
2006-07-16 23:18:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by jeffrey j 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
are you kiddng me?? blair is bushs lap dog and i hate having the leader of my country being a lickarse to bush but nothing we can do about it we need the alliance and now it has got us involved. there is one thing everyone should learn from this. NEVER get involved with america it creats more problems then it solves. we go to war with them and what do we get out of it? terrorist attacks and half our army killed. i fail to see the silver lining in this case. i am actully suprised america hasnt found a need to get involved
2006-07-16 12:35:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not agree with George Bush on anything, however when he said that Israel has the right to defend itself. I do agree, So it is me and Bush, and Blare, I am sure that there are others. But after all the terriorist attacks on Israel I think it is time for them to whip a little Arab azz.
2006-07-16 11:05:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blair will always side with Bush because he is spineless and as anyone asked the people in the U.K. what we think?
2006-07-16 10:49:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by dragonnookie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wish that Blair had some BA**s and stood up against Bush.
2006-07-16 10:46:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tommy D 5
·
0⤊
0⤋