Why not? Enough people blame everything else on Bush. I've heard him blamed for 9-11, for gas prices, for the price of olive oil, the price of beef, the state of the school system, and plenty of other stuff I can't think of off the top my head.
(begin sarcasm):
In fact, that Chicago concert I went to the other night has affected my hearing... but maybe that's Jeb's fault, since I live in Florida. Nothing to do with being 20 feet from the stage, of course. Maybe it's both their faults! The Brothers Bush have ruined my hearing. Traffic was real bad in West Palm, too. I wonder which one of them I can blame that on?
(end sarcasm.)
Sorry for the irrelevant rant, but isn't that what most of the actual Bush Bashers do?
2006-07-16 16:01:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by meathead76 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
No. The whole thing will be blamed on Jews. Jews are always held to a higher standard, and are always blamed for causing others' actions.
Israel withdrew from Lebanon with promises from the International Community that Lebanon would control Hizballah extremists. Israel withdrew from Gaza with promises from the International Community to control the border with Egypt.
And what did Gaza do with their freedom? Did they build an infrastruction for their state? Nope. They started firing rockets into Israel.
When the International Community loses control and reneges on promises, they start accusing Israel of over-reacting. Jews have one tiny plot of land in a huge Arab environment. They have reached a dead end and they're not going quietly this time.
It wasn't up to Bush to control the Lebanese nor the Palestinians. Why would anyone blame Bush when there is an entire Arab community that must share most of the blame. Which Arab nation is doing anything to resolve the crises? Which Arab nation supported the Palestinians and helped them to build a nation? Does the Arab community share any of the blame? I submit they deserve ALL the blame.
You may not like Bush, but he cannot control the actions of every country on earth! They will all suffer the consequences of their own actions.
2006-07-16 13:48:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Hatikvah 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe. But it's not Bush's fault. And anyone who looks at the reality of the situation will see that.
Bush has made his own massively stupid mistakes, and there is plenty of illegal conduct that he should be held accountable for. But not what's happening in and around Israel.
That conflict has been going on for decades, because the major political and military powers surrounding Israel have stated their intentions to wipe Israel off the face of the map. Israel just isn't going quietly, much to their consternation.
2006-07-16 13:25:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. not being able to do anything effective to end the conflict will be blamed on Bush, and rightly so. Did Iraq mess, which is Bush's fault, have anything to do with the mess regarding Israel? Probably. He is an idiot, after all.
2006-07-16 13:35:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I HATE BUSH! But he CANNOT BE BLAMED this time. It is only the fault of the Israeli army, who is bombing innocent people and Hezbollah who kiddnapped Israeli soldiers. However, Bush is blatantly siding with the Israelis due to his conservative and religious bias. (don't call me a commie liberal, I'm a moderate.) He certainly could be helping to solve the conflict with less bias. However, the war itself is not Bush's fault. Bush is innocent this time.
Note to the guy who posted before me: don't try and defend the Israelis because they are the only non-arab nation in the middle east. They took the land and declared themselves independent while the U.S. supported them completely. It is only a problem because we were to lazy to give the Israelis some of our land so they went and took some in the middle east without justification.
2006-07-16 13:54:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why the fuc*er is responsible for creating a mood in the where everyone who has power and means should go ahead and resort to war against those who bother him.
All countries have a liscence now to take their enemies and potential threats out unilaterally. It is only a matter of time when there will be too many such wars to control.
2006-07-16 13:38:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by boogie man 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes as well as the bird flu, gas prices,globe warming, US soccer loss,9/11,the price of tea,all murders in and out side the US, The war in south east Asia and the pimple on Hillary's bottom.
2006-07-16 14:17:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't stand Bush - the anti-Christ personified - but this is one thing that so far, he can't be blamed for. But, give him a chance, he'll figure out a way to send in troops and get some Americans killed.
2006-07-16 15:04:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You've opened the door for Bush haters to opine. Be sure they will. Bush is a brave man who takes a lot of heat.
2006-07-16 13:48:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, while I dispise Bush and his family, even I have to admit, he has done NOTHING but act with honor towards Israel and the problems around it.
2006-07-16 13:43:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by AdamKadmon 7
·
0⤊
0⤋