yes there should,Bill Murray is still one of the funniest actors around,so he should definately be in it.
2006-07-16 08:53:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think so, the new movie is a no-win proposition. If they 'modernize' it, the old fans from the 80s will scream bloody murder, and if they stay true to the old ones, the young kids will be bored and confused. I think they should just leave it be.
2006-07-16 04:11:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by mischugenah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No as it would ruin the first 2
2006-07-16 10:01:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya i loved ghostbusters, that would have been great but dont know about the title ghostbusters in hell? dont know it doesnt sound so great.
2006-07-16 04:17:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The cast is too old to be taken seriously. You would have to add a lot more characters to make it work.
2006-07-16 04:09:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by LORD Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! The first one was great and the second one sucked. They should have left well enough alone!
2006-07-16 04:10:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by odandme 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they cast the original actors/actoresses, i think it could be a hit. I dont like it much when they cast new actors, its never the same.
2006-07-16 04:09:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by lonely as a cloud 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think one film was enough. I think Disney should make a sequal to Tron.
2006-07-16 04:09:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I don't even think there should have been a second...or a first come to that.
2006-07-16 06:23:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they would need to change actors then
don't think the same 4 would garner much interest
2006-07-16 04:10:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by acnemycin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋