I think you may be surprised with Aaron Brooks this year. He's needed to get a fresh start for a while and the Raiders do have some weapons for him to work with. I think Brunell will be solid again this year due to Joe Gibbs getting the most from his players. The key is his health. If he can stay healthy, he will give you decent numbers, but with Aaron Brooks, you have a sleeper potential for a breakout year.
2006-07-16 04:18:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by VertigoU2 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I dont think so at all. Aaron Brooks might be ok especially because of Randy Moss. They also have Jerry Porter. Those are some good weapons for a qb to have and may produce some numbers. Brunnell is reall old but added Antwan Randel El and Brasndon Lloyd to their receiving coprs that already boasted Santana Moss. Not to mention a good offensive line and Clinton Portis to hand off to. If he can stay healthy he might be one of the better fantasy qbs. Maybe see if Rex Grossman is there as a back up. He might have good numbers.
2006-07-16 13:05:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by drunkbomber 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mark Brunell might have a decent year but Aaron Brooks is wildly inconsistant. To answer your question, Brunell - no, Brooks- yes.
2006-07-16 11:05:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by dasher 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. I think Brooks is the worst starting QB in the league, and I think Brunell is washed up.
2006-07-16 15:24:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Brunell is a Stud Qb. He has a Perfect offense around him and a amazing Coach.
2006-07-16 18:10:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
brunell is a definite bust. Brooks could do quite well.
2006-07-16 13:27:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sparkiplasma 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
need to check when was the last time either one of them had a good season, both are on the decline and will be lucky enough to lead even a canadian football to victory
2006-07-17 12:24:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-07-19 12:24:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by chet 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
not brooks.... hes got porter and MOSS!!
2006-07-16 15:30:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by twauson12 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think so
2006-07-16 14:11:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by →◄Alex►← 4
·
0⤊
0⤋