I just do not understand this. The Italian authority banned any new publications of Princess Diana pictures - published in Chi newsmagazine - because this hurts her Diana’s sons and lovers feelings – that is great. But the strange thing is when the offensive photos of prophet Mohammed – Muslims’ Prophet – were published no action was taken from any government; on the contrary, the pictures were republished everywhere, under the pretext that governments cannot deny newspapers and magazines their “Freedom of Expression” right. I do not know what will happen now that the Italian authority has denied its newspaper this right.
2006-07-15 22:48:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
For "freedom_2bu", I think you can if both have the same impact on others. in this case, hurt other people feelings.
2006-07-16 00:01:34 · update #1
It does seem a tad unfair doesn't it? Either they learned from the previous experience or they pick and choose who to bow down to. I would imagine the latter to be true. I'm sure you've heard the expression that freedom of expression is great an all that but it freedoms do come with responsibilities, and in the previous situation, the publications preferred to ignore their civic duty.
2006-07-16 04:05:29 · answer #1 · answered by stacey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is what is called as politics & beurocracy!! Change your colour like a cameleon!!!i
2006-07-15 22:52:39 · answer #2 · answered by THE WORRIER 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One is real the other fiction .You cant compere photos with drawings can you?
2006-07-15 22:55:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋