English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Che was also named aTerrorist in life but after death he became symbol of resistance agaisntWorld Injustice.Hussan Nasrulah is also delared terroristbut as defiant to America as Che.

2006-07-15 22:31:39 · 9 answers · asked by nostalgia786 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Freedom Fighter? He is a terrorist for the repressive Islam religion.

Muslims are destroyers, not creators.

I understand and respect your right to an opinion, however, you are an idiot...

2006-07-15 22:47:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I fully understand why you might declare them heroes, but in doing so, you forget that to us, they ARE terrorists. We're supposed to appreciate and excuse their attacks on us and the West? WE'RE fighting against "World Injustice", heck ALL OF US are fighting against "World Injustice". Such empty words. That's why the U.S. has disposable kings. We don't keep our symbols around too long because of the nonsense it inspires in one side or the other. We tend to tear them down.

Defiance to America? Good for you. We don't expect you to give us what we want. We SUPPORT competition. That's why, when you attack us, we attack back. It's not our preferred way to compete, but if that's what you want, we'll play. We take our games very seriously, and often treat real life much like a game. It's a surprisingly healthy way to live.

Be aware, though. Islam has OTHER options! We keep leaving the door open for you, in various ways, to play a difference game, where you don't have to be terrorists. Hopefully some will be wise enough to do a little reform at home and join the rest of us in the 21st century. Free speech and democracy are frightening to dictators, but best for the people.

There's no way your people can possibly NOT learn all about the freedoms of the West, the technology, the sharing of ideas and belief systems. There's no way any one will ever get a monopoly on the minds of their people again.

Islam must change, or fail.

We're hoping for change. Your move.

2006-07-16 09:11:09 · answer #2 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 0 0

He's just another thug who has found his way into some media coverage. He represents one of the most evil, repressive groups I have ever seen. He and his fellow "freedom fighters" would subjugate the whole world to their particular brand of fanatic Islamic religious rule. This "hero" would enslave the entire Middle East into a state like Taliban ruled Afghanistan. The free people of the world must resist this kind of evil intent by any means on moral grounds. Why would I ever respect a group of people who kill you for watching a soccer game? Or gun you down in the streets for wearing shorts while playing tennis. Che Guavara (sp?) is just another manifestation of the same terrorist mentality.
These people are like the Germans and Japanese during WW II in that if they are left to continue unresisted, they will spread like a cancer that will eventually threaten us on our own shores. What happened in NY on 9/11 was just an inkling of what will come if we don't intervene now.

2006-07-15 23:59:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nasrulah is pure,undiluted and adulterated terrorist of the highest and cannot be described as a freedom fighter.What kind of freedom is he fighting for?
Che gouvera had his own domain and qualitieshe was not firing cross border kyatusha as well as kidnapping other nation's citizens.Dont project this NASARULAH man from that angle.He cannot and will never achieve that feat.

2006-07-15 23:33:40 · answer #4 · answered by worldpeace 1 · 0 0

Che Who? Guevara! If your gunna try to portray a dirty evil terrorist as a good guy with an example, try getting the name right.

2006-07-15 22:36:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

For anyone to step forward in these dark times of american/zionist terror in the middle east is a move of outstanding courage. Any idiot can overcome an enemy who is weak and incapable but it takes a particular type of courage to face an enemy who is strong and without any morality.

2006-07-16 00:53:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

love love love them both.
che was a great compassionate man, and he gets a bad rap by the media.
nasrallah is super smart, outspoken, and standing up to those zionist pigs. he is a hero in my eyes! just because the usa declares someone terrorist, that is just bs! he is no terrorist, he is a god fearing man, that is standing up for the rights of people, when their rights have been taken away by the zionist

2006-07-15 22:36:19 · answer #7 · answered by evanlah 6 · 0 0

So, Bush is bad and these guys are good. Boy you can pick looser dirt bags for heroes! What the hell are you learning in school?

2006-07-15 22:58:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nasrullah is a good leader

2006-07-15 22:40:15 · answer #9 · answered by hunga bunga 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers