English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or if bushie jr. would have gotten a brain transplant, would our soldiers be dying at war?

2006-07-15 19:43:03 · 14 answers · asked by mn8dtruth 1 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

If Bush Sr. had pulled out early, there wouldn't of been a "Bushie Jr" and; our soldiers wouldn't de dying because of them.

2006-07-15 20:14:59 · answer #1 · answered by larechiga26 4 · 0 0

If "bushie" either one, had made different decisions not to stand up, yes our soldiers wouldn't be dying at war. Our citizens would be in terrorist attacks. It is a trade off. No one wants to die in war or peace. However, despite whatever agenda the president's had, our soldiers are trading their lives for the civilians that would have died if we hadn't taken action. Our soldiers aren't fighting for a foothold in the middle east or for oil. They are heros who think their fighting to save an oppressed people. They believe they are fighting the good fight. No body can deny that we were attacked without due provocation. No one can deny that innocents are dying every day because of cowardly terrorist attacks motivated by what ever. Our soldiers are trying to save people they don't know regardless of what the governments designs are. Don't diminish their sacrafices. It isn't fair. Hate Bush if you want, but know why our soldiers are fighting. I have spoken with civilians, soldiers, and international contractors. They all believe they are there to help. You put enough pressure on the government and you "will" get the soldiers brought home, but "should" they come home. Our soldiers are there to defend the defensless. That is noble. If bush wants oil, a foot hold, or a governmental realignment then so what, as long as those agendas allow our soldiers to champion the humanitarian efforts that are despartely needed then I support bush. You bring them home and they died for nothing. Explain that to the 2500 families who have lost friends and family in Iraq and Afghanistan. We witnessed on 9/11 what happens when we don't do anything. Hate me for my response, but this is what I believe. Bush has my grudging support.

2006-07-15 20:00:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Had it not been for Bush Sr being afraid to remove Saddam (plus Gorbachev's demand that Saddam pay off debt owed to the Soviets) and Clinton becoming President in 1993 we would have had Saddam out a lot earlier than 2003 and we would not have Troops in a good chunk of the Middle East now.

Would Bush Sr have gone after Saddam a 2nd time I do not know but im glad Bush Jr did

2006-07-15 19:47:30 · answer #3 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0 0

I am trying to make sense of your question.

Bush Sr pushed Iraq out of Kuwait and stopped at the border. He said he was not going to invade Iraq because it would have cost to many lives and what would he tell the parents , he recognized the fact their would be terrorist, that he would be breaking international law and he would have lost most of his allies.

That is what Bush Sr. said to a group of vets!

Bush, the idiot, had no reason to attack Iraq and it was against International law! There has been a lot of dying since, while Bush cuts Vets benefits!!

2006-07-15 19:57:24 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

Bush sr did pull out early, and labeled us as quiters.
If GHWB had nuked hussane back to Hell, none of our troops would've died.. If Eisenhaur had nuked North Korea to Hell, we wouldn"t have had a VietNam.. If we had not created the U.N. we would have won the hell out of the Korean conflict, and the rest of the world would have known to not mess with america.. The sooner we nuke Syria and Iran , the sooner we will be able to clean up and go on.. If we wimp out and do a half assed job of it, we will continue to be looked at as quiters and will be disrespected continuously.

2006-07-15 20:00:12 · answer #5 · answered by mr.phattphatt 5 · 0 0

First thing first,The CIA put Sadam into power to keep the Iranians in check when the U.S.A. was fight the Iranian's Then the USA decided they didn't need him anymore and cut off his aid and arms. Now you wonder why the world hates you so much,stop butting into countries that don't want you,you screwed up Iran,now Iraq Who's next??? you can't even take care of your own citizens with your homeless and poor people,look what happened in New Orleans,Canada did more for your citizen then your own Government,Hell we've rebuilt towns for you,and still haven't heard one word of thanks,Frank Stronach who owns Magna has put over 500 people into new homes,ya you're welcome!!

2006-07-15 19:58:11 · answer #6 · answered by gr8leaf 3 · 0 0

Really, Bush's father should have pulled out early. Then there would have been no George Jr

2006-07-15 19:46:25 · answer #7 · answered by Ferret 5 · 0 0

if bush sr. finished the job in iraq in the first war, instead of letting saddam stay in power, we might have been better off.

or if clinton responded to the first bombing of the world trade center with the resolve of our current president, we may have avoided 9/11.

2006-07-15 19:47:34 · answer #8 · answered by hotrod9230 2 · 0 0

GWBush is the BEST arguement for legalized abortions and condoms that the world has ever seen. Though I would have thought Barbara Bush's looks would have been contraception enough!

2006-07-15 20:28:54 · answer #9 · answered by GrandPoobaah 2 · 0 0

not hypocritical in any respect. easily it really is a daft evaluation. You presented it up not I. If i'm talking about the warfare in Iraq why may I carry something up that has not something to do with it? of route gang-violence is a difficulty, yet that would not undermine the warfare as a difficulty both.

2016-12-10 10:16:15 · answer #10 · answered by mundell 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers