So the US invaded Iraq with a BS story on it's find Wlado and the weapons of mass destruction crapolla. It controls parts of Iraq -why do you think they can't let the journalists out? They don't control most of Iraq and the soldiers keep getting killed left and right. Bush has lost all credibility world wide except with some trained idiots in the US and so a new story or plot was developed.
You are supposed to hate Iran and thats all the news is going to tell you. Bush is trying to be diplomatic all of a sudden....why because Israel is going to provide the US with the credibility to invade Iran. The USA will get to be dragged into the conflict they want so badly because they can't just walk in anymore and they need some support.
This is likely going to turn into WW3 but don't worry the rich will be saved at least some of them.
2006-07-15 17:28:27 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I wonder how many people had heard of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Osama Bin Laden, El Quada, etc. or even knew they existed and even now know their location on a map?
Probably very few and their first knowledge of these "terrorist" countries was from their own media after 9/11.
Having said that, the US "hatred" of Iran or Iraq for that matter has nothing to do with the US, but has all to do with Israel.
The US is merely acting on the whims of Israeli Zionist who control the US.
I believe that what the US citizens are really missing to see when they defend Israel's right to "defend itself" is that if they go into war with Iran, the US & coalition soldiers will be the ones who will suffer and not the Israeli soldiers. The US soldiers will be caught in the middle and Israel will send out its nuclear weapons from Israel to destroy Iran, catching the US soldiers in the process. Is this what the US really wants for its soldiers - to fight Israel's unlawful battles at their (US) soldiers expense?
Just food for thought!
2006-07-17 11:50:03 · answer #1 · answered by nevine99 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm not here to argue but Clinton was insisting on invading Iraq when they kicked out the inspectors when enough anthrax was found to kill the world 12 times over.His advisors wouldnt allow it due to him losing his popularity so he left it up to the next regime.
As noted by 60 minutes, in the 90s warehouses were built throughout the USA with anthrax vaccines ect and Clinton even stated terrorist attacks were inevitable. Most politicans, included Kerry knew these facts and is why they supported the war.
We are put into an inevitable, undesired situation by the "crazy people" of the world, and it's getting more serious than you realize.
2006-07-16 00:36:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WOW!
Such perfect grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
From what blog did you copy that?
2006-07-16 00:36:11 · answer #3 · answered by ed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And your question is??????
Maybe you should take your stilted rhetoric to a blog site....you seem to have such a profound grasp of world politics...........NOT
2006-07-16 00:34:54 · answer #4 · answered by Capt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You sure use a lot of words to say nothing.
2006-07-16 01:10:54 · answer #5 · answered by composertype 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are a ****** moron!!
2006-07-16 15:37:03 · answer #6 · answered by lc_firefighter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋