Should ALL (100%) of elected officials (state and above) undergo a forensic audit of their finances for irregularities and criminal activities?
2006-07-15 14:47:19 · 6 answers · asked by athorgarak 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
VOTE FOR INDEPENDANTS ( and independence) AND VOTE OUT INCUMBANTS IN '08
A healthy country, a constitutional government, a better choice
2006-07-15 14:48:20 · update #1
Think about this:
Most jobs now require both background check and drug testing before hire. Why should we "hire" someone to lead the country without AT LEAST these tests. Many people forget, those "people" in Washington are OUR employees - they work for US, not the other way around.
On your additional comments, why wait until 2008, start this year -midterm elections. Throw all of the bums out.
2006-07-15 14:55:02 · answer #1 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Amen
2006-07-15 22:15:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should undergo extensive background checks, including lie detectors and monthly random drug tests. One violation and they are banned for life and imprisoned.
2006-07-15 22:03:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and no,,,, realism,,, Bill Clinton had it,,, but drove fiscal conservatives, crazy,,, I think men like Cheney, Rove and George W. were jealous,,, because their own wives would,t give them the time of day,,, much less,,, a cigar,,,,,,,
2006-07-15 22:10:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. No.
2006-07-15 21:59:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
very good question yes they should
2006-07-15 21:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋