if an iriver is better which one iriver clix or iriver u10 series?
2006-07-15 11:08:30 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics ➔ Music & Music Players
how small is it supposed to be (iriver not ipod)
2006-07-16 06:06:24 · update #1
iRiver Clix. Best for your money.
It does a lot more than the Nano. It's got a cool design and better battery life, too.
It's $200, the same price as the matching-in-capacity Nano. The Clix won CNET's Editor's Choice award.
Subscription compatible, as well.
2006-07-15 17:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by perfectionist_tn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends. If you plan on using the iTunes music store, you're locked into using an iPod. If you want to use a WMV music store, you're going to need to use a different portable audio player. I don't know much about iRiver players, but I'd assume that they support more file formats than an iPod. Also with the iPod you are paying a premium for the high quality build materials. An iRiver probably also has some more features. In the end it boils down to what you want. If you want looks and the iTunes Music Store, buy an iPod. If you care more about features and don't mind using a different music store, get an iRiver or other music player.
2006-07-15 18:42:02 · answer #2 · answered by karl_n21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the iRiver better, but i think it depends. I just got an iRiver Clix. In fact, im listening to it right now. The biggest difference between them is Macintosh and Microsoft. Which one do you prefer between those. So far, iRiver Clix is the hottest thing on the market for Microsoft. iPod is the hottest thing on the Macintosh market. They are pretty much competition against each other. Everyone is right. The iPod is just looks. Plus, the iRiver Clix is a way better price
2006-07-16 03:34:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
iriver if you are an audiophile. ipod is more "cool" of course!!
as for iriver clix is a preferable one
2006-07-15 18:12:33 · answer #4 · answered by Debauchari 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An ipod! Definitely ipod.
2006-07-15 18:12:49 · answer #5 · answered by pyro 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
UGH do i need to reapeat myself again the ipod is only good for its looks all other mp3 players have much much better sound quaity especially the creative players
2006-07-15 19:17:03 · answer #6 · answered by kickenchicken360 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
iriver not the stupid ipod
2006-07-16 02:39:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ipod
2006-07-15 18:11:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
iPod owns all....hands down
2006-07-15 22:11:16 · answer #9 · answered by bdecker202 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I WOULD SAY IPOD... WAY BETTER QUALITY MATERIAL BRAND NAME AND JUST GREAT QUALITY.. LONG LASTING AND ENJOYABLE.
2006-07-15 18:11:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋