English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

The I is disproving the statement by saying that he's been doing nothing for years, therefore doing nothing is possible. It's not a very logical counterargument because not parallel, he is not saying that nothing is possible but that doing nothing is possible.

2006-07-15 09:55:48 · answer #1 · answered by browneyedgirl 6 · 0 0

Then it's even possible to do nothing.

2006-07-15 09:52:23 · answer #2 · answered by lightningviper 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers