2006-07-15 08:44:27 · 30 answers · asked by vze485zw@verizon.net 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Mythology & Folklore
So good off you to take time off from choking the chicken to ask this question.
2006-07-15 14:57:25 · answer #1 · answered by Bender 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I've answered this question before - the chicken probably was created first - or the rooster - because the chicken couldn't produce the egg not unless the rooster performed his duties! So, it probably went like this - really it did.
God created Adam - on one of those days while God and Adam were in the Garden of Eden - He gave Adam the responsibility of naming all the animals - so then the rooster and chicken began to understand what they were - I forget whether they were told to reproduce - but it is there in the Bible!
The rooster would have to be a part of this because you wouldn't get anymore eggs - therefore no more chickens!
Thanks for that question - the answer is - You ain't getting no more chickens or eggs if a rooster ain't in that mix!
2006-07-15 19:20:26 · answer #2 · answered by twinklecomfort 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer this question, the chicken was born first because the egg has not hatched.
To answer the age old 'chicken or egg' question, the chicken came first. I know this because I am 85,846,153,843 years old so stfu.
2006-07-15 09:09:53 · answer #3 · answered by ffffff 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The egg was around long before the chicken
2006-07-15 09:03:20 · answer #4 · answered by pilgram92003 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Egg without doubt, coz chicken must have evolved from some bird/creature and in all it probabilities no multicellular complex organism can be reproduced or evolve w/o going thru the process of an egg mating with a sperm
2006-07-15 09:05:37 · answer #5 · answered by sgurbir2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The predecessor of the chicken, which was not unlike small reptiles which lay eggs evolved into what is now a chicken, so to answer your question neither or both.
2006-07-15 09:39:53 · answer #6 · answered by igɳo★ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The chicken...it had to lay the egg and sit on it to hatch it. You were an egg once...what came first you or your egg? Think of it that way and it makes perfect sense.
2006-07-18 11:26:14 · answer #7 · answered by SouthernBelle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, "eggs" aren't technically living beings & therefore they cannot be born. If you are asking which CAME first, it was the egg because dinosaurs laid eggs before the first true bird, a descendent of the Archaeopteryx , ever existed.
2006-07-15 10:13:24 · answer #8 · answered by Ashley 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the egg, chickens didn't appear on the earth till after the dinos were extinct , so i am going with , "the egg came before the chicken"
2006-07-15 16:58:39 · answer #9 · answered by aaronj2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The egg of course. You can argue that you need a chicken to give birth to an egg first, but I'd argue that it was a species mutation... evolution... gradual.
2006-07-15 08:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The egg. Chickens did't appear on this planet until way after the dinosaurs!
2006-07-15 08:48:29 · answer #11 · answered by I think therefore I am 2210 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋