English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-15 08:40:02 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

25 answers

Oh, my, are you under-educated. If you had done your research, you would know what a horrible slap in the face your question is to anyone who survived World War II Germany. Don't ever--EVER--compare George Bush with the mindless sociopaths that made up Hitler's campaign party.

Besides, I know people in the modern Nazi party. And both Bush presidents are definitely not welcome among their ranks--because both are blue-blooded Republicans. Get your facts straight.

2006-07-15 08:51:58 · answer #1 · answered by bracken46 5 · 0 0

Well the Nazis would be the German National Socialist Workers Party, so no matter how much you dissaprove of George W Bush calling him a Nazi would be lunacy. Ted Kennedy would be closer to such an assertion. A modern Nazi, in political philosophy not mass murder, would favor many social programs, as opposed to trying to remove them as George Bush has.

2006-07-15 13:40:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, he's a fascist. That's an important distinction because, while all Nazis are fascists, not all fascists are Nazis. Nazis hate Jews, while Bush hates gays, Democrats, and the Bill of Rights. Leaning too far to the right politically always leads to fascism, but there's still hope. All we need to do is vote more Democrats into Congress and bring back the balance required for the established checks and balances to work the way they should again.

2006-07-15 09:06:03 · answer #3 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 0 0

No, but his Grandfather Prescott Bush, made a ton of money selling bonds to support the Nazi Regime until around 1940's then the government passed a law banning selling them from Banks.

2006-07-15 08:57:07 · answer #4 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0 0

Prescott bush was the Nazi banker. I really think that the current administration has learned a lot from the Nazis, but their only politics is gaining more wealth and power.

2006-07-15 08:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow,what a bunch of haters.bsouthe nice name calling at least kucitizenx tries to argue w/o name calling.kucitizenx is wrong on every point.I won't waste my whole day on this,there were 16 reasons in the resolution congress passed,not just WMD's, Iraq twice went to Niger to talk about trade,Niger has sand and yellow cake uranium,Iraq has plenty of sand,why in the world do you think it was't about yellow cake? Cuz Wilson says so? Saddam shot at our planes in the no fly zone,gassed 300,000 kurds,impeded and expeled the U.N.weapons investigators. Since 2003 we have found 500 degraded yet still lethal WMD's,yet still insist there were none.If you're sure about the degraded state of these weapons would you or kucitizenx like to bury them in your backyard? Valarie Plame was no longer a covert agent,that leak is so important to you yet nothing about the leak of the NY Times about the following of the terrorists money trail.Would it have been OK for the times to print the time and place of D-Day invasion? If all terrorists knew of this program how'd we catch the Bali bomber with this program? Did he want to get caught?Wiretapping of international calls should only worry you if you have something to hide. Do you think they're wasting time listening to the average American or people that have terrorist ties? Abu Ghraib,I'd rather have underwear put on my head than to be beheaded, soldiers in uniform receive protection under the Geneva Convention,not terrorists in civilian clothing. Iraq had no ties to al-Qaeda? Why does Zaquarwi after being wounded in Afghanistan,travel thru Iran to be treated in Iraq? I thought you liberals wanted freedom for all people.Why not the 50 million people in Afghanistan and Iraq? Oh by the way Joseph Kennedy also had dealings with Germany and lobbied FDR heavily not to go to war. You all had the same arguements during the Reagan administration in regards to the cold war with the Soviet Union,you were proven wrong then and you're wrong again.

2006-07-15 09:46:16 · answer #6 · answered by Kennyp 3 · 0 0

Nazis are horrible disgusting people. I know this sounds somewhat like Bush, but he just isn't smart enough to be a Nazi.

2006-07-15 08:54:48 · answer #7 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 1 0

I'm sure if you'd of studied up, or even watch the movie, The Holocaust, you wouldn't even be asking this question, or maybe you're a troll. Nonethaless, your question will draw every Lib on Yahoo! out from under his/her rock with their unfounded "proof" aka Lib propaganda links that kucitizenx has been so kind to present us with. If you'll notice, none of those links have not one solid bit of documented proof, just typical, mean spirited, Lib opinions, and conspiracy theory type information. Let me explain this to you, k? Bush saved the Iraqis from a monster, Saddam Hussain that killed, raped, tortured, and starved 100's of 1000's of his own people, and dumped them like dogs in mass graves http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/legacyofterror.html
Americans have the greatest, most envied economy, and freedoms in the WORLD. That doesn't jive with Nazism, and common sense tells us that. As for the whole "war crimes" claim, and "impeachment", "lies to go to war..." Well, sorry Libs, but the Dems voted for the war based on not just intelligence from the Bush administration, but also intel they seen long before Bush was even in office. Sorry, but those votes, and their statements about Saddam being a threat, having WMDs, and having ties to terror organizations CANNOT BE SPINNED AWAY by the media, or Michael Moore type propaganda. As for the NSA wire tapping, the same goes. The Dems voted for that program, and their votes can't be spun away. The Libs sound like kids that have gotten caught smoking in the school bathroom, "It's not my fault, they were his cigs.." Give me a break! Hey Libs, if you're not a terrorist, or associating with them on the phone, or online, then you don't have to worry about the NSA wiretapping.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

2006-07-15 09:15:19 · answer #8 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 1 0

NO. The Nazis hated the Jewish people. Google the Nazi history. You will not find much that represents what Dubya does.

2006-07-15 08:50:50 · answer #9 · answered by profile image 5 · 0 0

Can't be, Nazis were defeated during world war 2. Best that he could be is a neo-nazis.

2006-07-15 08:43:23 · answer #10 · answered by CMR2006 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers