Are there any Etherists still out there?

Question

Seriously.. I am slowly becoming convinced that the ether exists. If it looks like a fluid, acts llike a fluid, then its probably a fluid. To think that there is nothing making up the void of space seems implausible to me.

Answer 1

Not all. Einstein,Maxwell ,Michelson,Morley,Tesla etc..all these geniuses who were firm believers in the Aether have gone past their time on Earth.
The 21 st Century physists are presently alluding to the existance of the aether as ths subtance of space that holds all structured matter together in the various configuration that we have observed.
Hence we are basically living in a fluid just like a fish in the water.
A fish cannot exist without the water.

What is called void or aether is now refered as space to assume that without proof that its empty is really a speudoscience misconception.

We did not create the Universe so we cannot say its empty.And what we perceive as human can certainly not be infallible.

There are many theories of the Aether. Einstein Expressed it as space time ,and in his field equations he showed as a geometrical curvature folding unto itself.

One interesting 21st Century theory is the Theory of Quantum Aether Dynamics, another is the Quantron theory of the Universe,and so many other too numerous to list.

21st century physics has become extremely interesting in trying to Unravel the Mystories of Creation.

Answer 2

Yes, aether theory is alive and well.

http://www.orgonelab.com/miller/htm
http://www.thunderbolts.info
http://www.plasmacosmology.net
http://www.anpheon.org

And yes, a void devoid of a "medium" in which waves travel is a ridiculous concept. Even Einstein in his later years said that there must be a substrate that vibrates. or else the theories are meaningless. If there is "nothing" then nothing vibrates?? So, there can't be a wave.

Seriously read the first link. There is most likely an entrained fluid aether, NOT the rigid structural ether that Michelson/Morely were looking for (having ASSUMED that transverse waves can only occur is solids, which subsequent advances in physics has falsified). Miller's work pretty much put the nail in relativity theory. Now we're just witing for physicists to catch up to the fact their theories are not sufficiently descriptive and are basically WRONG in assuming everything is strictly gravity driven, etc. Electromagnetism is the only force capable of working over such large distances as the cosmic scale.

Transverse waves:
(superfluids) http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/07/990730072958.htm

(plasmas [most matter in the universe is in plasma state])
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Waves+in+plasmas
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/alfven+waves

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/longitudinal+wave

So, anyway, the aether is there, regardless whether physicists see it. Most likely plasma (which composes most of the matter in the universe)... Which can conduct longitudinal and transverse waves (pretty sure I read that right in one or more of the above articles)...

We really need to get away from the vacuum/gravity-centric model and have our astrophysicists sit down with our electrical engineers and plasma physicists. Maybe then they'll get a clue and know what to look for...

Cheers!

Answer 3

It doesn't look or act like a fluid, all experiments disprove ether. The atmosphere on earth has vast emptyness between the particles compaired to liquids and solids. There are a few stray particles in the emptyness of outerspace.

Answer 4

The etherics are bigger than the electron or the nucleus of the atom.The etherics are the medium of ingress.The etherics bind the sti to the ni.

Answer 5

For everybody out there: Physics. An all-pervading, infinitely elastic, massless medium formerly postulated as the medium of propagation of electromagnetic waves.

Yeah, I don't know ... it probably exists...

Answer 6

i wish i had a greater understanding of physics
:(

Answer 7

dont know