not discovered, just born into stardom? like, hasn't ashley tisdale been acting since she was like 2? and miley cyrus is only famous because her dad is a country star, right? and creatures like paris hilton (*patooey*) were simply born into riches, therefore famous, beautiful and "talented", right? why arent stars simply discovered anymore?
2006-07-15 07:04:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Theater & Acting
reason #1: they have more famous contacts.
reason #2: directors and music people are more willing to hire them because they think (and usually are right) that they can get more viewers/listeners(at least at first) which means more money for them.
reason #3: as for kids who have been acting since they were babies, little kids are cute. eventually they get older and get more "rep" and thus get more jobs. to the extreme look at the olsen twins.
most film and music directors seem to want to play it safe nowadays. say some 14 yr. old girl trying out for the first time or hasnt done a lot in "the business". she is against some girl the same age or younger who has been on broadway and tv shows for most of her life. the director plays it safe and hires the second girl because he knows more about her(though the first girl could be better, but he doesnt know that for sure).
i dont know that for sure and it could be on the extreme, but thats what i think probably happens a lot. correct me if i am wrong.
luv ya!!!
2006-07-15 08:53:56 · answer #1 · answered by Miss Independent 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It relies upon greater often than not upon their length. a 10 billion-three hundred and sixty 5 days-previous famous individual with .a million image voltaic mass will nonetheless be greater often than not hydrogen, with some helium. a 10 million-three hundred and sixty 5 days-previous famous individual with a hundred image voltaic plenty will incorporate particularly a lot of iron, silicon, and different heavy factors. yet, whilst comparing stars of a similar mass, the older the famous individual, the greater heavy factors it could have in it. Addendum: whilst comparing inhabitants a million, 2, and 3 stars, a million (the youngest) could have the main heavy factors, and 3 (the oldest) could have the fewest. that's as a results of fact inhabitants a million and a pair of stars are made partly from fabric that has already gone via nucleosynthesis and been expelled via supernovae.
2016-12-10 07:33:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wouldn't call ashley tisdale a star. What has she accomplished in her life? Not much. Call me when she ties Hillary Swank in Oscars.
As for Paris, she's not a star, she's a celebrity. Big difference. She is a socialite with no talent in anything but being rich and partying.
2006-07-15 07:08:10 · answer #3 · answered by truthyness 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you are on lots of magazine covers you are a star?
Some people are born into being a star (Prince Harry)
Some become a star (Daniel Ratcliff - a.k.a. Harry Potter)
Some become stars in one field after being popular in another field (When Harry met Sally star Billy Crystal who is actor via stand-up)
Some people become stars because of their looks (Debbie Harry)
Some people become stars because they are Hairy (King Kong)
If you don't buy the magazines... they don't become stars.
2006-07-15 10:02:01 · answer #4 · answered by Education_is_future 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that those people are consided stars by anyone over the age 12, at least they shouldn't be.
And I don't think that anyone thinks that Paris is actually talented.
2006-07-15 08:01:09 · answer #5 · answered by operagirlmary 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I also wonder becaude i would like to act and i am very good at acting
2006-07-15 10:09:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they all ready have the money.
2006-07-15 07:12:30 · answer #7 · answered by RainCloud 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is just the metter of money, and how many ''powerful'' people you know...
2006-07-15 07:34:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because they don't have contacts..money, or don't want to
2006-07-15 07:08:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋