I've heard it's owned by a British compay but it seems that it's reporting is so biased that it reflects a perfect picture of George Bush ..........the wording for example terror war insurgents etc.
The "terrorists" have just declared war - they lost thier terror status when they did that (my opinion). I am ussually on the side of Israel but not this time - they started this. The news seems to be prepareing me for a war with Iran all the slow propagada news is pointing us that way and no one seems to want to cover the fact that would involve Russia. George seems determined to be the last US president.
2006-07-15 06:31:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
When I said George seems to be determined to be the last President I was refering to his suicidal actions as of late. Nuclear war would mean that he'd be the last all right. You may be the biggest guy on the block but ou can't **** everyone off and not expect some retaliation.
2006-07-15 06:43:59 · update #1
CNN runs the lower levels of the state department
2006-07-15 07:19:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
CNN, aka the Clinton News Network, is not on Bush's side. They try to be neutral but most of their correspondents and on air personalities are left leaning and it comes through in their coverage.
They are owned by TimeWarner a publicly traded corporation headquartered in New York City. Ted Turner sold out years ago.
Don't forget the influence Israel has on the entertainment/media industry.
2006-07-15 14:07:01 · answer #2 · answered by C B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember that time when CNN turned on the cameras on Bush like 10 seconds while he was starting at the ceiling ... confirming all our beliefs that he's really a chimp in a suit ...
I don't think its biased, I think they are just highlighting the morbidly funny parts of the news of the day ... if your sense of humor sways that way, its quite entertaining.
2006-07-15 13:46:23 · answer #3 · answered by shellsandscripts 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you seriously suggesting that the Communist News Network is sympathetic to Bush?
It is run by Ted Turner and not the Brits. It is in no way pro-Bush and to say so is just blatantly untrue.
And your suggestion that Bush wants to be a dictator is as ridiculous as suggesting that Hugo Chavez is a democratically elected leader as opposed to a dictator who wins through fear tactics ...
2006-07-15 13:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by brewcityconservative 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really know the answer to your question, but most news channels have a bias in one direction or another, and yes their choice of wording or what they report has connotations about their positions on the matters. We are probably being prepared for another war, sadly, the government doesn't tell us exactly what is going on, they manipulate us into accepting their plans. "What, Saddam didn't have WMD? Sorry, but anyway, we're already in Iraq, so...."
2006-07-15 13:36:53 · answer #5 · answered by advicemom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarily. But I'm getting the impression that one of their correspondents, Suzanne Malveau, is on their payroll, or least of somebody at the White house.
2006-07-15 13:37:01 · answer #6 · answered by gshewman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cnn is owned by ted turner.
2006-07-15 13:36:34 · answer #7 · answered by Jason H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure does seem like it sometimes.
2006-07-15 13:34:33 · answer #8 · answered by askme 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋