Do all world biologist believe in the Darwin theory for the Bird(origin of species)?

Answer 1

Not all of em. Some are way too closed minded to believe anything besides what they are told. The majority however is well educated, and therefore believes in evolution and darwins theories.

Answer 2

Not all world biologists believe in Dawin Theory! Some biologists believe in Intelligent Design Theory than Dawin Theory. As a matter of fact, some biologists believe earth is only about 5,000 years old according to the Adam & Eve Theory.
If life were created only 5,000 years ago, that must have been the awesome power of GOD.

Answer 3

Nope! Contrary to what the evolution-brainwashed masses are telling you, neither creation beliefs nor evolution beliefs are rooted in science (at least, not GOOD science). To be good science, it must be: 1.) observable, 2.) testable, and 3.) repeatable. This makes any "science" of origins not really good science, because anything dealing with origins is not any of those things.
People are people, even ones who happen to be scientists. They form beliefs about the world around them, and the data they take in through their senses is passed through the filter of WHAT THEY ALREADY BELIEVE TO BE TRUE. Consequently, the data that fits the model they have already begun to form in their minds is retained, and the data that does not "passes through." Some people have the intellectual integrity to admit to that, others do not. The danger with science is that it tends to attract very bright people who have a tendency to be somewhat arrogant and too trusting of their own abilities to take in and analyze all the relevant data. i.e. a real inability to admit that there might be something that they've missed.
Both creation and evolution beliefs are just that: beliefs. MODELS for understanding something that is still largely not understood. All models are inaccurate, but some are useful. When you analyze the available data, you will probably find that it fits one model better than the other. And that's what it's about, finding the model that best explains the available and observable data.

Answer 4

For all intents and purposes, Evolution is a fact, not a theory. The reason it's still considered a theory is mostly due to the lack of data at the very beginnings of life. However, the transformation of one species to another is factual and unquestioned in science.

Whoever is pushing that "theory" crap on you is deceiving you or is completely clueless.

So the short answer is YES.

Answer 5

Darwin's Theory of Evolution was developed from watching the Finches in the Galapogos Islands. It is proven, so all scientists believe it to some degree.
Examples of evolution visible today:
1. Average human height has increased at least 6 in. within the last 100 years.
2. Our immune systems, and their ability to fight disease. It has changed over time so our young are born with partial resistance to some diseases.
3. Darwin's Finches are still visibly evolving; view this link from Yahoo! News: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060714/ap_on_sc/darwin_evolution;_ylt=AvtJjRRMygREYEIHqk7_fjdvieAA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--

Answer 6

Almost all ornithologists believe in evolution. There is a great deal of debate in ornithology about what evolutionary path birds took - did they arise from an archosaur in the triassic, or did they arise from dinosaurs in the Jurassic?

The consensus is beginning to form that birds arose from feathered theropod dinosaurs in the mid-Jurassic.

Answer 7

Among Bhuddist, Muslim, atheist, Hindu, Jain, Jewish, Shinto, Animist, Catholic, agnostic, Ba'hai, and polytheist biologists, yes, 100%.

Among Baptist biologists, only about 70%.

Answer 8

Yes, I think most biologists do believe in microevolution, including myself.

Answer 9

Al of the ones who aren't funded by rightwing conservative groups do.

Answer 10

No.