why iranian nuclear program is Dangerous ?

Answer 1

-insane leader
-leader openly says he wishes to "Wipe Israel off the map"
-Leader who believes he must wipe out 1/3rd of the worlld for their islamic messiah to come
-Iran has threatend the USA in the past months
-Iran would become a bigger threat than North Korea
-Iran would threaten Iraq and Israel and euroean countries .

"well... i dont think it is dangerous. It's just the US who is making a fuzz out of it...

It's no big deal... most countries have nuclear programs but nobody minded...

Why dont they bug korea who is openly testing their nuclear weapons?"

Wow just the USA? Last time I checked Israel, France, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, etc.. were making a "Fuzz" about it too.

So basically your solution is to try to negotiate with someone that HAS NUKES instead of an insane leader that is CREATING NUKES?

Tell me these countrys that have these nuke/nucleur programs.

"It's not. It's for their own protection. How would anyone feel if we (the U.S.) did not have nucler wepons?"

So when the Iranian leader openly says he wants to wipe israel off the map, its for their own protection? The leader is a dangerous guy, it is very ignorant to say it is for peace.

"The only way that program is dangerous at the current time is that it puts notice to the Bush administration as well as the rest of the world that there is ONE country that would have a chance of defending itself in the event the United States would attack."

Yeah keep drinking the anti-american anti-bush kool-aid.
Iran is using the nucleur program to attack Israel. Thats the whole point of it.

What kind of leader would you make? Just let the world have nukes?

Answer 2

A number of reasons, first they hate the US. More though, they hate the Jews, and thus Isreal. The Iranian president has, on a number of occasions, publicy stated that he is committed to wiping Isreal off the face of the planet. A nuke only makes that easier.

People will also say that it will not be dangerous because the Iranians could not get a missle to a target in America because of our missle defense. However, if they were not aiming AT America, but OVE, the nuclear missle would become an EMP knocking out and completely destroying all electronics for hundreds of miles over the detonation site. If you could imagine all power going out and all infrastructure being destroyed from D.C. to New York City, it would be terrible.

The Iranians having nuclear weapons is dangerous because they would use them, not just threaten, not in an attempt to deter others, they would actually use them. We know this because they have consistantly said they would. I used to think the same thing "we have them, why can't they" But we will not use them unless we have to, Iran will use them whenever they want.

Answer 3

In normal fights between two , anyone will challenge the other with whatever weapon he has. A sickle if one has and want to use, the other also will find one to protect him from the challenger and in due course the two will be afraid of each other to use the same. Until one doesnt have a weapon , the other guy will be afraid of him and his weapon.Higher grade weapons like , guns etc can be assumed as the above.
Between countries if everyone has the same thing, there will be mutual respect among them and no " authority" can be prevailed over the other like what happened in Gulf and Arabic countries were on the receiving ends.But with prudence US handled when they used against Japan , it can be said well, but if Japan had it first , the vice versa the actions were, the same contention we could have now.
Hence the problem before us is that the powers which already possess nuclear energy can not control and dictate the newer ones and may fear about involving in the latter's domestic affairs.
But when the conflit escalates to uncontrollable stages, the involved parties may want to use the weapons first fearing the other may do so. This is going to be the crux of the problem in future. In villages we have come across such a situation where challenges are exchanged , the one who exhibits his power wins.
But overall one has to restrain himself which only can stop the collapse of our living system but the solution can be offered by civilisation and meaning to our life. Such things are rare and can not be found in of many countries but it still exist in soils as India.

Answer 4

The question isnt about them having a nuclear program as long as it is a peaceful one. Its about them having an illicit program. The fact is noone was told that they were engaging in uranium enrichment until just recently and when they were offered a light water reactor (of the type used for energy) they turned it down. More than so the reactor that they have is of the type that one would need for the storage and maintanence of weapons grade nuclear material.

Answer 5

Do you mean aside from the fact that they are known to fund terrorists and provide them safe haven within their borders? Aside from the fact that they are openly militant toward Israel and some of their other neighbors? . . . They are potentially as dangerous, or even more so, than Korea . . . You also have to take into account that there are Muslim extremist groups indigenous to Iran . . . Due to these facts, anyone like that with nuclear weapon capability could be very dangerous for alot of people (not JUST the USA either) . . .

Answer 6

Not at all. Not much of the middle east have any power at all (military or nuclear.)
Its about time they built something to protect themselves.

But I do think that Americans and Israelis will thinks its dangerous, because Iran is a Muslim country, they actually care if their Muslim brothers or sisters around the world in other countries are being hurt, and they will fight who so ever that is hurting them. And usually it is the Israeli government doing the hurting.

Answer 7

Post Cuban missile crisis, nearly all nuclear nations operated under a code of transparency. We always knew what the Soviets were doing and they always knew what we were doing.

Iran doesn't want to play by those principals and thus, is dangerous. We finally got India and Pakistan to understand that. (Pakistan still scares me because there are so many parts of that nation that are not under government control).

Plus, with Iran's ties to Hezbullah, Hamas, and other terror organizations, there is no guarantee that they would keep nuclear weapons under state control. This is vital. Nuclear weapons under the control of terror organizations will allow criminals to bribe and threaten legitimate governments around the world.

Answer 8

The only way that program is dangerous at the current time is that it puts notice to the Bush administration as well as the rest of the world that there is ONE country that would have a chance of defending itself in the event the United States would attack.

Answer 9

Because the goal is obtaining a Nuclear Weapon, which we are afraid they could not be deterred from using. Iran is a state which would not care about their cities being bombed in return thus ohter nations having the bomb is not a sufficient deterrent as it is for the western nations.

Answer 10

well... i dont think it is dangerous. It's just the US who is making a fuzz out of it...

It's no big deal... most countries have nuclear programs but nobody minded...

Why dont they bug korea who is openly testing their nuclear weapons?