one that uses least resources yet fast. thanks
2006-07-15 04:18:44 · 16 answers · asked by Deja vu 1 in Computers & Internet ➔ Other - Computers
XP and 2000 are very similar, in terms of the code underneath. XP provides additional compatibility with older software, and it is also marginally faster.
Go with XP.
2006-07-15 04:22:35 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Windows XP
2006-07-15 04:24:53 · answer #2 · answered by anuja m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Windows XP for other works...
And
Windows 2000 Pro for big networks... good for security...
2006-07-15 04:28:07 · answer #3 · answered by Web-designer © 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Least Resources: 2000
XP is a fine system, but if resources are an issue, then you want 2000. In many respects they are VERY similar and most software that will run on one will run on the other without a problem.
2006-07-15 04:22:03 · answer #4 · answered by lwcomputing 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the standards for XP: 300MHz/128MB RAM/a million.5GB And for domicile windows 2000: 133MHz/64MB/2GB Your equipment meets the bare minimum for the two, in spite of the shown fact that it is going to hold out plenty extra desirable with domicile windows 2000. So circulate with that. additionally, from journey, domicile windows 2000 is a rock in terms of stability.
2016-11-02 02:50:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The most up to date Win2k is more stable, and runs "fastest", but you're looking at mostly enterprise level and server type programs. But Windows XP will have more support for everything, especially games, and will run those faster undoubtedly.
2006-07-15 04:22:27 · answer #6 · answered by ymingy@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
xp you can do more it is faster and also on 2000 pro you cant do everything you can on a xp but dont get one vista is coming out soon
2006-07-15 04:32:18 · answer #7 · answered by gate123456789p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Windows XP by far is more optimised for performance on the same hardware even with the additional fat of system apps, etc.
2006-07-15 04:22:10 · answer #8 · answered by Keith 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
XP - also its still supported fully by Microsoft. I believe they stopped 2000 support some months ago....
2006-07-15 04:22:30 · answer #9 · answered by Ade 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
XP rocks
2006-07-15 05:06:17 · answer #10 · answered by titanium 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋