English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

how can compromise be a better way of resolving conflicts?

2006-07-15 04:03:05 · 10 answers · asked by nicholasskywalker88 1 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

Compromising is a better way to solve a conflict, but if one or both parties are unwilling or unable to compromise then confrontation is the obvious result. If you look at the conflict between the Palestinians and Israel, they are unable to compromise because Hamas and many of the Palestinians final wish is for the destruction of Israel, and that obviously is something Israel won't do. Compromise has to come from both sides. It's the same with the United States and groups like Al Queda and Islamic Jihad. We would gladly negotiate with them, we've tried, but their end wish is for the downfall of western civilization and the installation of a world wide Theocracy based on Islamic ideals, which is something we're not willing to do... so we have conflict and confrontation. It's unfortunate, but I don't see how it's avoidable.

2006-07-15 04:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by Oilfield 4 · 0 0

You sit down and discuss the problem and come to a conclusion that makes both parties happy and feeling like they've won. Unfortunately, in the world today, there are too many mental midgets running around (Bush, bin Laden, Hezbollah, Hamas, the jerk in Iran, Kim il Jong in Korea for example) who feel that guns and military might are the best way to get your point across. If you threaten the other guy - or even better, send in troops or terrorists - they'l capitulate. Hasn't worked yet - maybe they should try sitting down at a peace table. Now there's an idealistic dream for you!

2006-07-15 04:53:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

compromise should always been the goal but if no compromise is reached the outcome has to be settled someway . for example . inteligence evidence stated there was WMD's in Iraq , they wouldn't give us a correct search and kept trying to extend it so we had to confront them

2006-07-15 04:29:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Confrontation - Compromise only prolongs the issue until confrontation is reached.

2006-07-15 04:15:37 · answer #4 · answered by therandman 5 · 0 0

Iblis made a call and also you actually have a freedom to decide on. until eventually the most suitable judgment all of us are loose. God is acquainted inclusive of your heart and that i pray that He courses you. Please recognize that the judgment day is coming and also you nevertheless have time to practice. God did not create you for no reason. you've a call to flow to hell or heaven. Please use your head and decide properly, ascertain now formerly some time is up. examine Quraan, recognize the data. also Jesus isn't coming decrease back, a minimum of no longer in accordance to Quraan and straightforward experience (although maximum Muslims and all christians believe he's coming decrease back). 10:36 yet maximum of them keep on with no longer something yet fancy: extremely fancy should be of no avail hostile to truth. Verily Allah is nicely attentive to all that they do. fifty 3:28 yet they haven't any awareness therein. They keep on with no longer something yet conjecture; and conjecture avails no longer something hostile to truth. forty seven:14 Is then man or woman who's on a sparkling (course) from his Lord, no extra constructive than one to whom the evil of his habit seems eye-catching, and consisting of keep on with their very own lusts?

2016-10-14 11:57:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

compromise means to settle down the conflicts, temporarily, not to solve it

2006-07-15 04:14:09 · answer #6 · answered by hado_hl3130 2 · 0 0

War is the final way that countries use in conflict resolution!

What do you think? Everytime we disagree with someone we kill 20 or 30,000 people?

2006-07-15 04:15:25 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

How about co-operation and collaboration insted.

Think outside the box.

2006-07-15 05:11:14 · answer #8 · answered by Rory McRandall 3 · 0 0

Confrontation if you are stronger, compromise if you are weaker.

2006-07-15 04:26:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

some people are not willing to comprimise, collaborate or do any form of resolving.
This is when you slap the taste out of their mouth.

2006-07-15 04:07:12 · answer #10 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers