Evolution: fact, theory and cause?

Question

Ok, lets all agree that the fact of evolution, or let's say, the biological natural continuum, the observation of the changes in nature is a FACT.

Second, let's all agree that the theory of the natural continuum (evolution), how it happen, is that genetic code was created.

Thus, fact aligns with theory.

The question I'd like answered, is how was the genetic code created? We know that breeding and adaptation can use existing genetic code and make new organisms. However, what I am asking is very specific, how were big chunks of "new genetic code" created that account for all the species and functionality that we see in life.

How were the 3 billion lines of genetic code that resulted in species and functionalities created? Is there a known and proven force that did this?

Answer 1

I challenge you to provide a single piece of scientific evidence that supports evolution. Where are the intermediate forms? Where is the slow progression from one species to another in the fossile record?

Genetics is as good as any place to start. Provide a single example of genetic drift of one species into another. Hell, provide a single example of a point mutation that lasts over 100 generations (point mutations become extinct after only a handful of generations). Show how a bacteria mutates into a new species of bacteria after forced to undergo millions of generations of replication.

While we are at it. Explain the process by which life "evolves" out of non-life despite the founding principle of biology, biogenesis. For all of the history of biology we have observed that life ONLY comes from other life.

You can do none of these things. Fact does not align with theory and evolution fails to pass the test of scientific inquiry into the matter. Since the scientific method is objective and standardized (the results are the same, no matter who applies them), you need to accept the fact that evolution has been scientifically proven false. Every single observation fails to support the theory. If you disagree, you either need to provide proof (which you can't) or you have to admit that your acceptance of evolution is not only dogma, but dogma in denial of the facts.

Fact does not align with theory, in this case. Neither breeding nor adaptation result in new organisms. You have many breeds of dogs, but never can you breed something that is not a dog. An organism NEVER changes on the genetic level in such a way that causes it to become a new species. Since they don't do this and we know they don't do this through direct observation using sophisticated techniques available today, no force causes that.

Providing proof of evolution is no joke, btw. If you could do it, it would earn you a noble peace prize.

Also, I'm not saying that there isn't a scientific basis for the origin of species. However, it is pretty conclusive that evolution is not it. It is disturbing that so many people ignore the scientific method and fall back on dogma with regard to this. Worse, they lie and claim that evolution is "scientific". Scientific specifically means that a theory conforms to certain objective, standardized rules of observation that result in every observer having the same results. Evolution fails to hold up under this type of scrutiny.

There was a time when people thought the world was flat or that the earth was the center of the universe. They ignored any evidence to the contrary and persecuted those that provided that evidence. Science was created to put an end to that nonsense. Sad that so much time has passed, yet so little has changed.

Answer 2

by chance, life is change and change can end up in something good that will then stick around.

OK, originally it was thought that there were only single strands of RNA (which has augc), since they were pretty unstable, double stranded DNA popped up (in which the u's were replaced by t's). 3 nucleotides of RNA can be made into amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. Genetic material sits in water and to protect it from outside at some point it became embedded in a layer of fat (hence the basic cell unit).

there are viruses around (consisting either of DNA or RNA) that can enter a cell and jump into the DNA - changing it. Some of those viruses have been in the DNA for quite a while and still jump around at times (so called jumping genes). When a cell divides into 2 often things go wrong and duplications and loss can occur. When these changes end up in some way helping the cell/organism, they will stay.

to me the life force is energy, is desire to be alive in all its different units, is the connectedness between organisms of all kinds. whether there is some ultimate power orchestrating the changes behind a curtain of mystery, maybe only death will tell?

Answer 3

Consider: EVERYTHING is nature is a duality; light, dark, up, down, left, right, tall, short, hot, cold, etc.

The scientistic fanatical-reactionaries who keep pushing the rotten theory of evolution down the throats of the millions are purposely failing to consider the evident existence of the dual nature of evolution. That is, the natural force of INVOLUTION.

Humanity must disposess itself of the notion that evolution is either an atheistic force, or a force that will eventually lead man to perfection.

Perfection is the result of a conscious revolution. It can never be achieved mechanically, through the forces of nature (who serves her own energetic purposes).

Evolution exists; but so does involution. That is why this humanity has reached such a barbaric, degenerated, and socially neurotic state.

We are involuting gravely as a humanity of intellectual apes.

For more information, look up a book called Gnostic Anthropology by Samael Aun Weor.

Answer 4

Most research tends to focus on the theory that the genetic codons themselves evolved out of simpler replicators. It is believed that the precursor to life as we know it today was from the first protein chains that developed the ability to make copies of themselves. As time went by, free flowing resources for such organisms were increasingly tied up in other replicators. Therefore the next evolutionary advancement was the ability to disassemble other replicators to harness there organic material. It is generally believed that this first competition for resources lead to the first natural selection events, as mutations created organisms with more resistance to being disassembled and others developed more advanced systems for disassembling. From this competition came ways to protect replicators genetic material and more efficient forms of replication. It is believed that first RNA became the dominant form of genetic material but was eventual supplanted by organisms which either mutated or combined to develop our present DNA system, which has ruled supreme ever sense.

I would suggest reading Richard Dawkins, River out of Eden, Climbing Mount Improbable, or anything he has written really as he has a wonderful talent for explaining difficult concepts in an understandable manner.

Below is a link to very complicated yet highly enlightening experiment on the subject. Part of a PhD dissertation. You'll have to download it. Its in ms word format.

Answer 5

well, i don;t remember any detailed description of gene code "creation". Nothing like "Origin of species", but it is easy to create a hypothesis. Like those huge lines of genetic code are made of a lot of repeats with unknown functions. So we can presume small pieces of genetic code were bound at some point. Also just about 10% of gene code has more or less understandable functionality, the rest of it still keeps its secrets. Bottom line: there is a very easy understandable machinery of DNA elongation. Evolution driving force for this elongation? Not completely clear but can be speculated as well. So if our civilization decides it needs to solve this problem in details, it is fully capable to do this.

Answer 6

Cell division, When the world was full of single cell organisms they started to combine into multi cellular structures such as yourself in the span of 3 1/2 Billion years.

I believe you have it wrong "code" represents something that is obscure. Think of it as a jigsaw puzzle.

There is no known and proven force just theories such as lightning and space dust.

Answer 7

in our primordial seas 4.5 billion years ago,scientists hypothesize that organic materials strung together to create the first DNA.however,it is difficult to prove this theory,so we will have to consider it life's greatest mystery!


Dr Randall I think you should think about your probabilities.there is much more likely chance to create DNA then an explosion at a printing press creating a dictionary.


pupil if you think that evolution equals progress,you obviously dint know much about evolution.

Answer 8

What I don't understand is how you can claim to understand evolution and still ask this question. Obviously, the code grew over time from far simplier code.

Answer 9

Well bacteria can gain new genes by trading plasmids, I don't see why that couldn't be extrapolated from a few chromosomes to the amounts of DNA found in plants and animals.

Answer 10

Primordial soup, Its all before us,we just have to look closer.Eons of attraction,mixing and re-mixing, trial and error.DNA is sticky Yes?Its ordered in its sequencing.When this fails,either they exist or parish.Don,did it again,nice job.It does a mind good to see real intelligence.
As for the bible thumping,this is a science site.Please, go to the indoctrinated sites.You control freaks have plenty of them.
2 heart cells beat independently.When they touch,a mico pause and they beat in uni-sin.