Did you understand it? I was left at the end going 'huh' and had to look it up on the IMDB message board and now I kind of get it, but it's still a little weird to me! Very well filmed though.
2006-07-15 03:32:22 · 2 answers · asked by L ♥ 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It fails because, in the end, the film has wasted a lot of time and energy on a punch line that could have been told in five minutes.
There is no plot. There is no "explanation" of her motivations, either. Why does she move from denial to despair? Why does she move to acceptance? I'm not saying a film has to beat the viewers over the head with reasons and its messages, but to create a story, the author has to provide an answer to these questions. The better authors do it by suggestion, implicitly. There is, obviously room to leave some doors open in a story. The lesser authors resort to exposition such as quoted above. And then there are those who attempt to muddy the waters to make them appear deep, who are, for lack of a better word, guiltier of a greater crime than the lesser authors. I believe this film fell into the third category.
2006-07-15 06:54:28 · answer #1 · answered by moviemike3 3 · 11⤊ 6⤋
It was a decent art film and I enjoyed it enough to say that I will buy it. The story was very interesting and left many things to discuss... not badddddd at all
2006-07-15 14:55:16 · answer #2 · answered by howlincoyote 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋