It probably will escalate.
BUT
It is naive to say the current problems in the Mid-East begin with Islamic Radicals. The Problem stems from the creation of the State of Israel in the midst of Arab nations and tribes, who had previously suffered colonial oppression from the Ottoman (Turkish) Empire, then the British Empire, then the American Empire (it exists). It is no coincidence that the largest portion of the worlds oil exists in Iraq and neighbouring Kuwait (which was originally part of the Iraqi territory until partitioned by Britain and the US with Kuwait given to a local businessman. Israel was created by Britain and the USA at the UN, in conjunction with Zionist bankers. Iran was interfered with by the US in the 1950s. Its democracy was overthrown and the Shah installed by the US because it was a socialist country and unacceptable to Fascist America (if you don't think America was and is a fascist country, think about the treatment of African Americans). It is a war over oil and its control. Its no coincidence that the Bush family business is Oil and Bush and Bin Laden know each other personally. Its no coincidence that Bin Laden was the Saudi Arabian radical who went to Afghanistan in the 1980s with the assistance of the CIA (director George Bush senior) to fight Russia. Its no coincidence that the Saudi Arabian Royal Family are in the pocket of the US in spite of having a governing system diametrically opposed to the US and that the bulk of the Islamic Radicals are Saudi Arabian. They are drawn mainly from the poverty stricken underclasses of Saudi Arabia and other Islamic countires and are fighting for economic and political freedom, using their faith in their God as a rallying point in the face of the odds being hopelessly stacked against any chance of winning. They would not need to be radicals, militants or terrorists if they had decent jobs, adequate pay and enough to feed, clothe and house their families properly. The current problems in the Middle East may be clearly laid at the feet of colonial powers (incl the USA) who have interfered in local affairs and stolen the oil resources to fuel their overly excessive consumption, leaving the local population in squalor and misery. Then the robbers have the cheek to say it is the victims fault as an excuse to invade again and embitter them some more. Iran is a hero really, if it gives other countries a chance to fight back on a more equal footing. They are a lot more restrained and dignified than American propaganda would have you believe. The nuclear armed terrorists currently causing problems in the region by invading other countries are.... ISRAEL, USA and UK. Think about it. Iran doesn't even have nuclear bombs yet. Who is the real threat to the most human life there? The simple answer is the most heavily armed and the most aggressive...ISRAEL, USA and UK. Think about it. If there was an attack on your country would you fight back? Think about it. They did fight back. But did they start it? NO. THE COLONIAL POWERS OF EUROPE STARTED IT BECAUSE OF OIL AND GUILT OVER THEIR TREATMENT OF JEWS IN WW2. The terrorists are only trying to defend themselves from colonial oppression. Think about it. I know if the US invaded my country I would fight them to my very last breath, which wouldn't be long because they have all the weapons. BTW I am a "white" person from an English speaking country.
2006-07-15 02:20:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
to Syria, probably. To Iraq - unlikely. I can more readily see Iran jumping way before Iraq, or even Turkey/Pakistan. Iraq is too busy with it's own issues.
Isreal is finally defending itself. The whole world except the U.S. and a few other countries have seen Isreal as a problem yet what have they done exactly to deserve this? It is all spiritual - Issac and Ismeal and will continue until the return of the Lord.
2006-07-15 01:35:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by lead2jesus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. there is not any direct chance to the U. S. (Syrian voters are rebelling hostile to an oppressive authorities) and Syria has organic and organic and chemical guns. even as the U. S. ought to win a warfare hostile to Syria, it should be extra expensive than both Iraq or Afghanistan, and the U. S. does no longer get a lot in go back.
2016-10-14 11:54:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
May be Syria is defiantly and Iran will be from back door sportier. It's more war against Muslims and Jew's war and all these Muslim countries are supporting all these tarriest groups with money arms and other facilities like providing them with training camps etc.
2006-07-15 01:44:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by lucky s 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possible. Most of the Islamic countries are weak and have to use terrorist's. They cannot fight a true war with any hope of winning, as has been proved repeatedly in the past 100 years. Leave Isreal alone and they will leave you alone
2006-07-15 01:53:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by mark g 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, Israel is the disease!! they want to expand and expand and they wanna take over everything and kill everyone!! Syria, lebanon and iran are funding these militias to help them free their countries! Israel started the whole thing by taking the land after WW2 and if it takes a WW3 to get it back, then they will have one!
2006-07-15 01:35:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Blend 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, your true..the causes of tensions in this region is certainly terrorist groups...if this situation continues to prevail..then a ww3 is imment...and they keep provoking Israel...dont think situation will improve..
see bomb blast in India...
2006-07-15 01:41:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by rapstar 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hope so ... this way we will kick the Israeli's butts, and by the way ... it's not because of muslims ... it's because of England and USA
2006-07-15 01:36:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Luay14 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
maxis- do you really beleive the crap you're typing?
ignorance abounds.
2006-07-15 01:46:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by daddio 7
·
0⤊
0⤋