Actually Lukas Podolski got the most votes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-14 23:50:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by madge 51 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think C. Ronaldo got what he deserved, which is a loud boo from any crowd every time he got his hands (oops, I mean feet) on the ball. If you look at the stats, Podolski had more shots, more shots on goal, and more goals than Ronaldo (who only got 1, and from a penalty so technically should have been zero). And don't forget fair play counts as well, so obviously Podolski deserved to win hands down.
ps. to __/````\O I'd like to see your grandma play in the World Cup, eh?
2006-07-15 12:51:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Aurora 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, Lukas Podolski deserved better than Cristiano Ronaldo. by the way, he scored three goals including two against SWEDEN in the round of 16.
2006-07-14 23:49:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by foongwk140804 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure, Ribery is criminally underrated some unknown reason. He replace right into a distinctive driving stress in the back of the French attack and could have been nominated for some thing (no longer ultimate youthful participant in all possibility 'reason it is for 21 and below). i think of human beings have been only too busy gaping at Germany's achievement (ie. Klose, Podolski, Lahm) that they neglected genuinely everyone else. And Messi replace into genuinely stunning (!!) yet regrettably he observed too little of the pitch, in the different case he could desire to have been ultimate youthful participant. Ronaldo's overvalued (with the aid of the female inhabitants, i think of), as for Podolski, he's magnificent, precise, and he's German, so something below a win could have been out of the question.
2016-11-02 02:39:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Podolski wasted so much oppurtunities where my grandma could have scored, but Cristiano Ronaldo is entertaining to watch and got in the action more, he could be the next Figo, just wait for 2010.
2006-07-14 23:52:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Arts 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lukas Podolski deserves this award... Cristiano Ronaldo? I think he's good , but not as good as Lukas Podolski... Podolski REALLY deserves this award....
2006-07-15 00:31:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Germany rox !!! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats true Christiano Ronald played better football but was unlucky as he missed some certain opportunities of scoring. Secondly Podolsky was voted by the FIFA officials so we can't do nothing.
2006-07-15 00:01:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by dua 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
cristiano ronaldo got the most votes on fifa world cup however these awards are not by voting........however ronaldo sometimes doesnot pass the ball and play alone thts why podolski won
2006-07-15 04:49:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
lukas was the best young player... cristiano ronaldo was much of a diver... he would fall at the slightest touch... and he also got rooney sent off... so, i feel that podolski was the better player
2006-07-15 04:04:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hah! Seriously?
Sure, Ronaldo is good..really good but Podolski has much more skill than him.
Well, personally either way they both are good...my vote went to Podolski.
2006-07-15 13:25:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pine.apple 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Podolski was great, but I thought someone like Lionel Messi from Argentina seems like a more promising player.
2006-07-15 00:00:23
·
answer #11
·
answered by sgt. pepper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋