English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Taking a clear look at the Mid-east, Islamofacists are the problem, the major factor... another being a world that has blindly tolerated the terrorist activities of Muslooms, a world that has forgotten Mao, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, Stalin, HITLER, and a few other pip squeak idiots that were able to gather a following in order to KILL those who do not believe as they do; a world of countries that turn a blind eye until they are the victim. The answer is to respond with overwhelming brute force every time they commit a terrorist act, they do not care who they kill, respond in kind with total force. STOP playing games. Dis-arming terrorists who believe starting a major conflict will hasten the return of their "god" is a waste of time, elimination is the answer, the only answer they understand, elimination will work. It is the quickest road to peace. Islam is not a peaceful religion, no matter what the politicians say. Mohammed was a person who had seizures and visions caused by those seizures. Read about him, a religion created by brain seizures. He was no god, not even a prophet. He was a tyrant.

2006-07-17 08:25:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Problem with solution: Hezbolla are armed and controlled by Iran and Syria. Disarming would mean take those two out. Not going to happen.

2006-07-14 21:16:03 · answer #2 · answered by peaco1000 5 · 0 0

I suspect Israel is bombing the **** out of Lebanon as a wake up call for Syria, (since Hizbolla head office is in downtown Damascus) and I do not think Iran will wade in because it doesn't want it's precious new nuclear facilities blown to smithereenies by the Israeli air force (which would be like shooting fish in a barrel for them).

2006-07-14 21:23:28 · answer #3 · answered by VIP 4 · 0 0

That is the logical answer isn't it. Unfortunately the Lebanese army isn't going to move against Hezbollah because the government is controlled by Hezbollah.

The real question is why Syria/Iran/Hezbollah have decided to incite and escalate a war?

2006-07-14 21:19:42 · answer #4 · answered by Perry L 5 · 0 0

before each and everything i believe each and each and every of the arab peopple who commented exceptionally the lebanese ones. i'm 0.5 lebanese myslef, and my dad became a teenager round my age (16) in the course of the civil warfare in lebanon. he fought the isrealis and a lot of hies acquaintances and memnbers of my kin were killed by technique of those isrealis. so the answer ot your question isn't any. the isrealis have under no circumstances received a warfare any "victory" or "purpose" finished by technique of those lots became a victory or purpose finished by technique of a overseas skill the U.S. helping the isrealis. they doesn't exist withou outdoors help. they could no longer have received the warfare in 2006 becuase HizBollah a defense force of 500 help offf a protection rigidity of 5000 and did not let them improve better than 3 ft in a procedure the way lengthy became that warfare a month. besides the rocket attacks that violated the geneva convention destroyed homes and issues that-get this HizBollah became waiting to payfor and attach. u parent it out.

2016-12-06 12:30:18 · answer #5 · answered by mollicone 3 · 0 0

The only solution is to end Israeli occupation of other people land . After ending occupation who needs arms. You have to look at roots of the problem. Is it hard to look up the roots its occupation my friend.Israeli occupation of the Palestinian land is the main reason for the on going wars in the Middle East

2006-07-14 21:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Arab governments are Israeli puppets. Organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah are die hard loyal fighters to their people, and they WILL NOT allow a puppet troops to guard a border for them.

2006-07-14 21:19:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If Hezbollah were to be disarmed, they would be following UN resolutions, so that would be the solution

2006-07-14 21:15:43 · answer #8 · answered by net_at_nite 4 · 0 0

Israeli withdrawal to the lines of 1967.,peace for land.

2006-07-14 21:36:34 · answer #9 · answered by mmohiedinn 2 · 0 0

That was exactly what was agreed on six years ago and never done by the Lebanese.

2006-07-14 21:38:19 · answer #10 · answered by Hi y´all ! 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers