English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

~With such an intelligent and objective question as this, maybe we should put you in charge. But, to get India's and Pakistan's blessings for the Afghanistan invasion, the US agreed to lift sanctions so both of these peace loving nations could resume their nuclear programs, so what's the problem? Both have been nuclear capable for decades. This is old news. Uncle Sam is still at the top of the heap for being able to erase the map, but it's only a matter of time before the rest or the world catches up. Rumor has it that everyone has the bow and arrow now along with gun powder. You expect that nukes, bios and chems are somehow different? Oh, you do? Well, I've got this bridge in Brooklyn for sale, if you're interested.

2006-07-14 20:21:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Just from they way this question is phrased shows me how much you actually know.

Which is absolutely zilch.

First of all, Pakistan was not responsible for the Mumbai Blasts.

And second of all, how exactly do you mean to f*** Pakistan?
That is unless you mean to involve yourself in war, that will result in India, being pushed back a thousand years, both economically and technologically.

And thirdly, grow up dude.

2006-07-14 20:25:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Much as I hate the acts committed by the terrorists, I would'nt go the extent of the tit for tat attitude, without any concrete evidence. If you've seen the past record's, any major bombing or terrorism act's are immediately blamed on Pakistan, and the muslim community is targeted. Internationally it's blamed on Osama Laden and his Al-Quaeda and in India it's the LeT or any organisation having a tilt towards Islam.

I'm not a muslim and neither do I have any affection towards any other country other than India.

2006-07-14 20:34:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First of all, I don't think that Pakistan is behind these blast. Mush is so f**ked already that he can't do all this. My prime suspects are Communist/Tamil Tigers. But of course, it cannot give government a good excuse.

Actually it is India's own fault. Why it let RAW to poke its nose everywhere from Bangladesh to Srilanka, and from Bhutan to Afghanistan? When Indian government doesn't have balls, why they try to be the one regional policeman like Israel in the middleeast? Before do that they should make their internal security strong, else not only Pakistan but Bangladesh and Srilanka will become a threat to India.

2006-07-14 20:23:25 · answer #4 · answered by omair 3 · 0 0

India can no longer end it. All of Pakistan's water flows in from Kashmir. So Pakistan only can stay with Kashmir interior the hand of the Indians. that's as a results of fact India is bent on nearby dominance, and having Kashmir to herself will provide India only yet in any different case to bully her neighbour. to that end Pakistan won't end on something under the whole Kashmir, via hook or via criminal.

2016-12-10 07:11:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

how u r sure that there is Pakistan behind the blasts?
it may be happened to stop the peace dialog between Indo-Pak. Indian government always blames Pakistan, if something wrong happened in India. i think its nothing more than the propaganda.

2006-07-14 20:22:21 · answer #6 · answered by Waleed 1 · 0 0

Really these leaders are using this activities only to their develop their political status! They just show sadness...when a bomb blasts!!

2006-07-14 20:23:02 · answer #7 · answered by shiva 3 · 0 0

What kind of stupid question is that.
Eye for an eye?
How about doing it legally.
I think they have arrested 3 so far.

2006-07-14 20:16:25 · answer #8 · answered by cheeky chic 379 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers