The Israel bombed the Lebanon who do you think the Right one: Israel or Lebanon?

Question

I will chose the best opinion?

Answer 1

Simple.

No one should bomb anyone to make this world a better place.

Answer 2

Ah, this is all part of a major plan under way. This is a very cunning plan and it can get a bit confusing, so follow along...

The United States wants Iran to end their nuclear weapons program, but they currently are not willing to start a war with Iran while they are still in Iraq. Instead, the Bush administration has convinced Israel to start a war with Lebanon because they know that Syria will be drawn into the war against Israel to help Lebanon.

Since Israel will easily defeat Syria and Lebanon in a war, Iran will be drawn into the war, to save Syria, which will give Israel enough reason to order airstrikes on Iran's nuclear production sites.

Ultimately, Israel will win the war and the Iranian nuclear weapons production capability will be destroyed thus achieving the original goal that the United States had in the first place. And the whole thing may even be completed without the USA even firing a shot in Iran.

Or maybe Iran attacking Israel will give the USA the reason they need to attack their nuclear sites...I dunno.
I am an American. I may not agree with their methods, but I must admit, they are effective and they are cunning.

Answer 3

In reading everything that has been written on every single news site possible, the media and ignorant public would like to make us all believe that Israel is the right ones in this conflict. I understand the counterpoint of, kidnapping soldiers is wrong, etc etc, but what about this, when you are a soldier, you have commited yourself to a country, meaning that you would be willing to do anything to protect it. Does that, or does that not include killing others when your country says so? So why is that if Lebanese guerrillas in taking the first strike concept and "attacking" four soldiers of Israel. Has no one realized that the wording of all the official releases from organizations and countries like, England, US, and the UN has been favoring Israel from the start. Does it not shock anyone to see "England and the UN meet to solve the bombardment on ISRAEL? are u seriously kidding me, WHAT BOMBARDMENT ON ISRAEL. since this conflict began, an estimated 24 people have died in Israel, damaging ONE MEASLY TOWN. On the other hand, you have Lebanon, which has lost an estimated 180 people, and as i type this, and you read, is becoming the next grand friken canyon. Israel is sitting back, in their nice leather chairs, pressing the deploy buttons on bombs that are destroying a nation, and still, no one thinks that Lebanon is the victim? That Lebanon is not the ones that are being bombarded by basically Israel and the US? And what makes a person think even more is when the worst president in the history of politics mentions two other key islamic countries, Syria and Iran, as "responsible". Another point i propose is, Why is it okay for the United States to publically supply Israel, who like to call, Americas true B*tch, with all the bombs and artillery in the world, but if Iran covertly gives another country a hand gun, that allies have to be formed in demolishing Iran, stealing their oil, weapons, intelligence, and RAPING their citizens? Where in this is Lebanon NOT the victim, and where in this is Lebanon NOT right. Why is it that when a country or organization decides, thats it, no more of this US or Israel bull, we are doing something, they are labeled "terrorists" or "a threat to society" by a guy who up until 5 years ago, had only one major decision in his day, Which free agent can i pick up for my baseball team this offseason? Both the bible, and the quran, mentioned a war to start all wars, what two countries were they, Israel and Lebanon. Are people really that ignorant that they cant see that this is all just a planned set-up. That Israel and the US are just using this as a gateway into Syria, and Iran. When will the time come where countries band together and form their own alliance against the United States? I can take a guess, World War III, possibly? When a country like Israel takes their US owned blackhawks or computer controlled missles and kills 100 people in order to just kill 1 "terrorists", leaving 1 man in a family of 6 alone for the rest of his life, why does he not have the right to fight back by strapping a bomb to his chest and going out because he has nothing left in his life because of two countries that are really testing the limits of their power, and in the process of strapping the bomb to his chest, taking out 15 Israelis?....Back in the world wars, they called this all imperialism, in this modern day, we call it Diplomatic Imperialism. Ever wonder why the US never really threatesn countries like Russia, India, Pakistan, or North Korea? Because they understand that these countries will not hesistate to deploy their own NUCLEAR FRIKEN WEAPONS? Look how wet Bushs panties got when Kim of N. Korea tested his missles that have the capacity to reach Alaska. But did he instigate a war? No, because he understand that, A. No oil in n. korea, and B. Wow i might really get messed up like america did against the Vietnamese. I know this is all going off topic, but it all relats to Israel, because i really think that israels should be all holding blue passports, but in the end, Lebanon is right.

Answer 4

I'll answer this question. This person hit the nail on the head:


The U.S., Great Britain, and Israel are good at playing the victim. They are quick to point out when they have been wronged, but are slow or altogether negligent in pointing out their own mistakes or malicious transgressions.

I suppose it's only human nature to be that way. The most guilty are often the least willing to accept guilt. They are the ones who will do whatever it takes to convince others that it is they who are the victims. This is easy to do when it's only YOUR version of events that your people are able to hear, and for the last 60 years, the Anti-Defamation League has made it impossible to criticize Israel without being labeled a racist.


The Israelis are like the home intruder who trips on the garden hose and twists his ankle, or cuts his hand on the window he's just broken and sues the home owner for libel. Or they are like a group of hippie trespassers, squatting on the farmer's land, except the farmer can't seem to make them leave, and any appeal to the local sheriff only leads to yet another, "Well, you know Jeb, those people have a right to be there too; just because this land has been in your family for generations doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to stay there. They had a hard time of it and would like to settle down. Oh, that reminds me, Jeb, you're gonna need to move you're trailer on over so we can make more room for the hippies."

Who can blame farmer Jeb when he gets pissed off and whips out the shotgun and blows some hippie squatters away? Sure, maybe he can't quite claim self defence in the matter, but protection of one's personal property and livlihood is like an inalienable right doncha think? Or maybe it should be. No, in this story, the hippies end up killing farmer Jeb's children and claiming self defence...and in this story the jury buys it. Instead, they convict farmer Jeb for terroristic threatening and award the hippies punitive damages.

I was watching Hardball on MSNBC the other night and a guest commentator from inside Lebanon, a British journalist, was asked by Chris Matthew's female stand-in why Israel would bomb the Beirut International Airport, to which he responded by saying that it was part of the Israeli strategy of blockading the country and served as an economic blow to the because this is tourist season and Lebanon's economy relies heavily on tourism. After the gentleman had answered the question, the host then added (I'm paraphrasing) "That, and we also know it's to cut off support coming in from Syria and Iran." The host felt it necessary to throw that in there seeing as she hadn't gotten the answer the network needed. Fortunately, the Syrian diplomat came on a few minutes later and gave the American media a smackdown. I have the interview on tape and plan on compiling a video of all the tidbits of propaganda maneuvering so all you overseas people can see what Americans are bombarded with on a daily basis. If I get my video capture card working, I'll post it on YouTube for you.

Compare what we're being shown and told with what you see in your news reports and you'll see a massive difference both stylistically and ethically.

I encourage everyone to put a blank tape in your VCRs, or put your TiVos on record and capture the propaganda for posterity. This is important stuff. If this is the start of a WWIII, if the dominos keep falling here, it will be even more important to actively dissect your news reports. If you don't capture what's said now, you may never hear it again, and tomorrow they may have changed their story without you even realizing it.

Answer 5

Well I think Israel is right at this time. I am Israeli, and I am not saying we are always right. not at all.
But this time, after a long time Israel do big moves towards peace, such as move out of Lebanon and move out of Gaza , after many years...
I must tell you that I was a soldier too, and every time, when Hezbollah kidnap soldiers they kill them. Yes they do - you can check. There are still some soldiers who´s been in Lebanon prison for over 18 years.
I don´t think that kidnap soldiers is a right way to negotiate for releasing Muslims from the Israeli prison - What about talking?
I am sorry to inform you, but there is very high probability that these 3 soldiers are already dead. And I think Israel, at this time, has all reasons in world to fight back.
Hezbollah have to learn how to negotiate... and who´s don´t want to negotiate and want to play with fire... he should be very careful not to burn.

Answer 6

It's amazing how little these Americans know!! Of course, it's because of the propaganda they get fed through the TV, but in these days of www. there's NO excuse for such ignorance!

Bush would LOVE to know how many Americans are swallowing the "Israel is pure, Israel is good, Israel can invade whatever country they want to and start wars whenever they feel like it - and if they prefer they can just bomb innocent civilians in any country with Muslims in it!" nonsense!

But then, those same Americans believe Bush was right to do exactly the same thing to Iraq! Some terrorists attacked America, so Bush invaded an oil-rich Muslim country that he KNEW had NOTHING to do with 9/11, and started a war that STILL isn't over! America not only sponsors Israel, and provides them with weapons of mass destruction, but they also follow the same game plan when it comes to arrogance and pure genocidal Islamophobia! You should realise that 9/11 would never have happened if America wasn't encouraging and assisting Israel in it's persecution of Muslims.

Lebanon is in the right. Israel know damned well that the Lebanese have nothing to do with the abduction, and they are deliberately massacring innocent civilians - possibly for pleasure, because they surely don't think it will persuade someone to hand over the hostages?!?!??! I think kidnapping soldiers from a hostile country like Israel is perfectly acceptable in this instance, because they only did it to try and get some Muslims released from Israeli jails - and the Muslims are NOT all suspected terrorists you know! I think it's quite reasonable in a hostile situation to swap hostages. Surely it was done frequently in both world wars? Probably in Vietnam too ...?

Answer 7

Lebanon

Answer 8

Definitely not Israel...Lebanon did not attack Israel ,it was attacked so it has the right to defend itself...Israel does not have the right to punish an entire people for what a few have done...So UN should ask Israel to stop the attacks ,not to Lebanon...

Answer 9

Reading up on this topic, it is clear to me that absolutely, positively, niether is right. Groups from both countries have malisciously destroyed lives in the others' country. The hate goes back so far all they can do to explain it is point to religious texts and things their parents taught them, it is fully perpetuated hate, no grounds beyond the revenges taken on this historic hatred. Both country's governments clearly give support, under warps, or not, to these groups. If you people hate each other, and they hit each other back and forth, if you take any one of those strikes, and ask which one is right, at that moment, the question is meaningless at the moment because there is so much context to it.

They each attack the other with a perceived good reason, to avenge wrongs done recently. It never ends, it goes back and forth, the cycle of violence and revenge. Mahatma Ghandi, regardless of how you feel about his actions or cultural background, is attributed to have said something that should be applied to this dilemma "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."

Answer 10

Israel is right, Lebanon should quit whining they let the terriosts stay and they know they are there, if mexicans or canadians were coming over the border and kidnapping americans and taking them back to do God know what to them americans would be steaming! Israel has the right to Protect themselves, they did not start this trouble,

Answer 11

Hezbollah is wrong not lebanon as a whole, israel is also wrong for punishing lebanon when its not the majority of people who are causing the problem.