Liberals are by nature "civil pacifists"; they really feel their silly protests and "harsh" words will change things for the better. Some liberals even cling to beliefs we can reason with savage deadly human garbage cowards, like terrorists.
The only good terrorist is a flat out dead one; but oh....that'd violate his ACLU civil rights, now would it????
2006-07-14 18:48:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Wizard 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
When u say terrorists, u mean the men & women causing terror and hate around the world...right?? i dont think that anyone aside from terrorists themselves like or stick up for terrorists.....
You say liberal...are u canadian?
In the past few years the word "Terrorist" has transformed from a literal word meaning to cause terror, to now middle eastern. Wh8ich has nothing to do with politic and evrerything to do with racism & stereotyping.
Dont think so??? I can counter that in ONE WORD.....
ROWANDA
Where was the world then??? OH wait...Rowanda doesnt produce oil...yes thats it....terrorists lately it seems only come from oil producing countires.....need i say more??
givjng you something to chew on....
tarah1980
2006-07-14 18:58:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by tarah1980 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is about love vs. hate. All those words "homophobic", "xenophobic", "islamophobic" are in simple terms call-calling and hate speech. this is authentic, once you've a view that others disagree with they regularly snap to hate, and call-calling follows. yet i do not recognize if liberals are worse at it than conservatives, although I agree it may look so. If i do not one hundred% help gays in something I say, i will actually get the detest speech ... "homophobe!" won't be able to be certain the hater is continuously a liberal tho. Hate is a human difficulty, and haters are cutting-edge in all walks of existence, even those outdoors of the united states and remote from any political association all of us recognize. you're excellent-on inclusive of your comments on the liberal media bashing Manny Pacquiao lately. this is now popping out that Pacquiao not in any respect reported a lot of what became attributed to him. Embarrassing for the media that jumped on him calling him convinced -- homophobic and each and every of the rhetoric -- now they're pulling a range of of articles. i will't locate those I observed earlier in the present day, hating and bashing. Is liberal media extra weak to hate speech aimed in route of those with disparate perspectives? Yea, there looks data for it. yet again, hate is a human, favourite difficulty, no longer constrained to any custom of political faction.
2016-10-14 11:46:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by xie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeapp...but I bet you'll remember those ACLU rights when they come over here and start shooting at your @ss.
A terrorist is all of those things. But how long do you think it would take to say them every time someone said that word? That's why the word is there...so yo don't have to. Duh.
I agree with Tarah.
2006-07-14 18:54:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by eyikoluvsandy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals are all about genocide. Since terrorists like to kill people, the liberals love them and do everything they can to help them.
2006-07-14 18:48:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm a liberal and i don't have to call terrorist anything their name speaks for it self.but you are right those names do fit them.
2006-07-14 18:47:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by onesickchick 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
u r G*ay. Go suc on sumones balls u queerevil hateful zionist!
2006-07-15 01:27:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by 3ajeeba_q8 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
cuz they are scare that the terrorist mite bomb their house.
2006-07-14 18:48:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a stupid question.
2006-07-14 18:47:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋