No mixing, the friends are the best you will have, the love is the best you will have, but with one, you can't have the other. So, with a love, you can have friends, but they aren't really that important in your life, and with friends, you won't have a love.
2006-07-14 18:30:27 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
Yes it would be great to have someone that would love me in such a way that I would have no need for friends, but that in itself denies what love is.
Sounds kind of oppressive to exclude close friends because you have a lover.
So I would settle for a few real good friends.
2006-07-14 18:37:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooooh, that's harsh. I don't know which, but right now I more have the romance. But you are basically asking if someone would rather have 5 loves who they aren't sexually attracted to, or one that they are sexually attracted to. Because to have freindships like that where it's lifelong and you are close and all, there's love in that. But it's different when there's that sexual attraction. Even just the slightest hint of one. It makes it... it makes you want to serve them and sacrafice for them, rather than just make them happy and let them make you happy.
2006-07-15 01:39:41 · answer #2 · answered by Some Guy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lifelong friends...and i dont believe we can't have both...in friends you may find the lifelong romance you have always been looking for..we just fail to see the truth...
2006-07-15 01:47:01 · answer #3 · answered by ~akoh~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would go with the life long romance.i would do anything to get a chance to go out with my guy.if they are realy my friends...they would understand and we could re-scedual
2006-07-15 01:38:05 · answer #4 · answered by ilyy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One romance because it's easier to get laid that way.
2006-07-15 01:56:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋