That is if you had no other choices?
2006-07-14 17:06:38 · 28 answers · asked by lbfm4me 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
either one is a sickening reminder of what our society has become.
2006-07-14 17:17:21 · answer #1 · answered by mr_resistor2003 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Clinton, for a few reasons.
First off, she's a Democrat, and while I don't always vote party, I typically do unless I have a good reason not to.
Second, I don't really like some of the decisions that Rice has made so far. While I can't think of any examples (and yes this might hurt my position, but I'm sticking with it) at the moment, I seem to recall a few that she made which only made me angry.
And lastly, because Clinton has direct access to one of the best politicians ever, her husband. He has gone through this before, knows it inside and out, will be able to talk with her about important decisions when they come up to help broaden her range of thinking, and would make a great first man.
Love as always,
Sebastian
2006-07-14 17:13:19 · answer #2 · answered by octo_boi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
would of 2001 Hillary said that i comprehend that Iraq has WMDs. Hillary said that the spouse of the terrorist crew PLO became an astounding humanitian at the same time as it includes helping the undesirable! Hillary has no longer been a important bill sponsor contained in the Senate considering the fact that being elected! Yep she discovered the thanks to lie and get with all sorts of lieing from her husband! Now she is a real sturdy selection for president isn't she. NO way NO HOW!
2016-11-06 09:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's amazing how often people on this website throw around the word "communist". I wonder if half of them have any idea what it actually means.
Though Hillary Clinton has spent the past six years becoming a political chameleon, and aped many of the Republican's positions on issues, she still remains a far better choice than anyone who has actually served in the worst administration in 230 years.
2006-07-14 17:26:30 · answer #4 · answered by Rory McRandall 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary, i dont think Condaliza has done anything to prove herself, hillarys married to Bill Clinton thats enough for me
2006-07-14 17:10:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither as condaliza said she wouldn't run and the clinton's showed their true colors way to many times and never would i vote for them. it would have to be some one like powell or someone that would not shame this great nation under God..thank you very much.
2006-07-14 17:35:31 · answer #6 · answered by stephanie56chevy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton all the way.
2006-07-14 17:17:52 · answer #7 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both women are very smart but I would have to vote for Hillary. Condi. is a friend of Geo. and works for him. Hill. has the best interests of the country as her boss.
2006-07-14 17:14:33 · answer #8 · answered by subsailor 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton already served as President. Two for the price of one, remember?
2006-07-14 17:12:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton becos Rice is to aggresive...she may make another WW4 if she elected as MRS.President
2006-07-14 17:11:24 · answer #10 · answered by Durydana 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton. It's her turn to get it on in the Oval Room. I wonder if she too has an affinity for cigars...
2006-07-14 17:10:33 · answer #11 · answered by Valkanas 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋