Theory of Evolution is based on fallacious thinking, are you fooled?

Question

Evolution propagandists personify Natural Selection with human intelligence of choice. It is called pathetic fallacy. Natural environments are often cyclic---from cold to hot, and from hot to cold, etc. How can it choose for billions of times to form beautiful men and women like yourselves? It is mathematically impossible. The theory can not fool me and my family, and every other thinking person.

Besides animals can move to more favorable environments. Even seeds of plants can wait to germonate till favorablet environments appear. They choose environments, rather than environments choose and change them.

Answer 1

The very idea that humans came from primates is pure idiocy. They find these skulls with large foreheads, jaws, and noses and they assume that it's some form between humans and primates. That proves the bible correct humans used to live for hundreds of years. The forehead, jaws, and nose never stop growing, so obviously if humans were to live for hundreds of years, their skulls would have large foreheads, jaws, and noses.

Answer 2

I don't support the theroy of eveloution wholly. I'm competely open to other possiblities. However, eveloution is what i was taught in high school science, so that's what i was raised to belive.

How can it choose beautiful people? What is beauty really? We as the aminals that we are decide what's beautiful. Natural selection states that the weaker cannot provide food for themselves, cannot make suitable nests, and therefore cannot attract suitable mates, if any at all.

This whole 'beatuy' thing is the result of the selection. Are you more likely to go get it on with some repulsive being or a receptive hot little piece of ***? And when you chose the hot one, what kind of baby do you think they'll make? hot babys. Those babys, being more attrative (attraitive as in displaying the qualities that are discussed in the above paragraph) are then able to reproduce due to good genes.

Do you think Ugh, who invented the wheel, died alone and childless? As we changed from hunter and gatherers to farmers and began to build permant dwellings natrual selection started to take a back seat. It was pushed way to the back when our society decided that man should have only one wife, rather then spread his superior seed to as many wombs as possible. (note: not superior becasue he's male but because he's the one who wins the receptive females by meeting/exceeding the above criteria)

Here's where i completely discredit myself (thank you history channel and discovery documents about the unknown). I think that the missing link between the humonid skulls that they found and us today is due to an alien visit in which interbreeding (if at all possible) took place creating a clearly supiror being over all other earthly creatures, with ever expanding critial thinking capibilites that evolved our culture from nests and eating ants off a stick into the city dwelling beings that we've become.

Answer 3

It’s so tempting to be long winded in response to this. But, I'll force myself to keep it at least relatively short. People who tend to disbelieve the theory of evolution are usually of a religious bent (“God created Man”). But, I say unto you, the two schools of thought, Religion and Evolution, are not necessarily exclusive of each other.

While its true that environments and climates often change, that fact actually supports the theory of evolution, rather than debunking it, or proving it false. Consider the dinosaurs. After some 250 million years or so of dominance, they went extinct, very probably because of climatic changes. This is called natural selection – the corner stone of evolution. (Comparatively speaking, Humankind has only been around for about 100,000 years, give or take, and seem well on the way to canceling ourselves out by creating new upheavals in the natural order of things.) Anyway, logically speaking, it’s easy to completely disregard the subjective statement concerning “beautiful men and women” in your remarks simply because this is another hallmark of natural selection. The end result is usually a biological organism (in this case, human beings) well-proportioned, and well-made = well suited to their environment. Now, if that environment changes, and the organism cannot adapt, then again, natural selection will run its course, and the species will be wiped out.

One final thing, while it’s true that God did create Man (kind) in his own image, this is not a refutation of the theories of evolution. It simply means that God created Man as a reflection of his spiritual, eternal image, the soul, if you will, not the crass physical machinery we have adapted and evolved to survive in the physical world.

Answer 4

i'm sorry you have been duped via the whole "Evolution can no longer produce new genetic education" nonsense. This difficulty has been thoroughly addressed. There are countless mechanisms via which new education must be extra to the genome. considered one of those is gene duplication. a great series of DNA must be duplicated, so as that it somewhat is now redundant. Then, it somewhat is loose to mutate in any way without risky outcomes the organism. in specific situations they mutate in this style of way that the code for a clean protein and to that end are then concern to selective pressures. Gene duplication is properly documented and properly studied. yet another mechanism could be retroviral insertions. A retrovirus inserts that is genetic fabric right into a bunch's genome. blunders in copying or insertion could convey approximately the virus's genetic fabric no longer working. Now the host has new genetic education it somewhat is loose to mutate and undergo selective pressures. Endogenous retroviruses are properly documented as properly. in fact, there are countless functioning genes in human beings that originated from retroviral insertions. You seem to have an fairly opposed physique of concepts in the direction of evolution and technology customarily. perhaps you sense that evolution is threatening on your non secular perspectives? There are thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of Christians who settle for evolution as a results of fact the reason of the variety of life. i ask your self, are you open to the possibility that perhaps evolution is genuine and that it somewhat is you with the lack of awareness on the subject count? if so, i could be happy that may additionally assist you recognize evolution and answer any questions you have have been given. yet once you're only determining directly to proceed to be close minded on the concern, and declare a-priori which you're precise, then I want you good luck.

Answer 5

I think you just answered your own question. If a certain specie can adapt and survival in environmental changes such as hot to cold or cold to hot, then they pass on there genetic code to future descendants. Also, if you think about it, every single person that is born are winners. Your mom and dad went looking for certain traits and came together to pass down what they found to the future.

Answer 6

Start with an idea. Represent the idea with words. You need to put the words together in to sentences following the rules of grammar. Punctuation (those dots and dashes) is also neccessary.

Answer 7

I suggest you actually read about the theory of evolution before you try to mumble jibberish about it. You may find that you are the one who is wrong.

Answer 8

You only have to look at the idiocy of opponents of evolution to be reassured that it is a pretty good theoty.

Answer 9

I'm starting to think that billions of years of evolution was wasted developing you. But I'll take my two points.

Answer 10

Yeh, I fooled. I got an extra bible here somewhere if yours got cold, mines still hot.