2006-07-14 14:46:10 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Normally on Israels side but I'm with Lebanon this time. Innocent civilians are getting murdered for a crime they did not do. And Israel is attacking a country, NOT a terror group like the claim to be doing. does attacking an airport constitute as anti terror? more like anti-civilian!
2006-07-14 14:49:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Israel was meant to be a holy land, and look how much suffering their neighbours are causing them, not just now, but throughout the centuries. I don't understand how anyone can take any side other than the Israeli's in these conflicts. Obviously, some of you didn't quite get who started this recent mess in the first place! Kidnapping a soldier is an act of war! The state of Israel has every right to defend its citizens and ask for their safe return to their homes. As it is impossible to reason with the terrorists, Israel is forced to use military force as an act of self-preservation. Let us not forget that Hamas, Hezbollah, and those who are supporting them, like the fundamentalists in Syria and Iran are repeatedly calling for the destruction of the state of Israel. Well, many have tried to pull off similar monstrosities, and failed, just remember the Nazi! And there is a God in this story, and he is watching over his chosen people, bright, smart, intelligent, hard-working and brave people - who have every right to do what it takes to get their kidnapped fellow citizens back - and who will win any battle, whether someone liked it or not! Shalom!
2006-07-14 15:32:47 · answer #2 · answered by Riva 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Israel. It has a right to defend itself. If Lebanon wants to stop it it should hand over the 2 soldiers. But that's easier said than done when they are being fueled by Syria and Iran. Anyone who engages Israel in war should read the Bible.
2006-07-14 14:57:35 · answer #3 · answered by Sunshine 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Peace is the need of day. Attack on Lebanon will divide the international community. It is expected that USA will play its role as America wants stability in Lebanon.
2006-07-14 15:19:04 · answer #4 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither one. It is not something I wish to be involved in. Not because I don't care about the people, but it is not my conflict, and my taking a "side" would not help either one. Ideally, I am on the side of a peaceful resolution for
both
2006-07-14 14:50:55 · answer #5 · answered by 1614 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isreal. Look at history. Lebanon was sopposed to dismantle Hezzbollah and they failed to do so. They deserve what they are getting!
2006-07-15 16:00:45 · answer #6 · answered by skifaster66 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isreal
2006-07-14 17:33:16 · answer #7 · answered by reallyfedup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand that Israel has the right to defend itself but its crossed the line its murdering civilians within lebenon and the soldier captured with in lebenon were captured while in within its borders, now ask yourself why are they inside lebenon in the first place ?
2006-07-14 14:52:36 · answer #8 · answered by IRunWithScissors 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am on neither side...both sides are in the wrong...I am only on one side and that is God's side which has nothing to do with Israel or Hezballah
2006-07-14 14:50:48 · answer #9 · answered by stephiestrobel 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's not israel-lebanon.....it's israel-HEZBOLLAH. the young lebanese gov't cannot contain the terrorists in their own country because their strings are being pulled by syria & iran.
so, with that said, i hope israel wipes them all out.
2006-07-14 14:51:31 · answer #10 · answered by zoo2626 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋