Not necessarily an invasion, but a bombing campaign right before the November elections. Wag the dog so to speak.
2006-07-14 14:36:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hahaha... bombing they could get away with... raise terror alerts... drop bombs... BE AFRAID!...
2006-07-14 14:40:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, President Bush has precious little political capital left and will not squander it on another Middle Eastern campaign, regardless of how deserving Iran is of getting their weapons sites bombed. I support Bush but doubt he'll take the chance.
2006-07-14 21:40:03 · answer #2 · answered by TakingStock 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We certainly have a lot on our plate. The question is, how far is Iran willing to go in provoking us?
If we did go to war, the American people would support this one more than they did the Iraq one. It seems more people recognize the threat here.
2006-07-14 21:51:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Iran is next. The American people have no direct say. They would go along if it went well, complain if not.
2006-07-14 22:01:50 · answer #4 · answered by Eric 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, I would support an attack on Iran. They are hell of a bigger threat then Iraq. We should have went for Iran. GOD bless the United States of America and our troops.
2006-07-14 21:39:45 · answer #5 · answered by BigK1118 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are enough dogs barking at the moment ... Invade Iran and we'll probably be kissing Israel Goodbye. - Why do you think Bush has grown to be more diplomatic lately? I just hope it's not too late.
2006-07-14 21:41:33 · answer #6 · answered by pickle head 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nahhh, we got North Korea and now Lebanon...hell, before it's over, we'll probably be fighting Syria too. Iran is WAYYYYYY down the list.
2006-07-14 21:40:51 · answer #7 · answered by Who cares 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go ahead, try it and see what happens.
2006-07-14 22:30:39 · answer #8 · answered by Frye 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋