what are you think about virtual sex, is it posible?

Answer 1

let's try

Answer 2

Not only possible, but a reality Today. I am the inventor, and CEO of the company that manufactures the Virtual Sex Machine. This is a machine that allows you to experience sex wth the use of a computer.
Like many others, I was intrigued by the possibility after reading about it in various Science fiction novels, and seeing variations of it in movies like Brainstorm. (Late 70's) As I grew older, and computer technology advanced, I kept waiting to see Virtual Sex become a reality. It never did. When I found a way to make it real, I started working on it. by 2000, we had a commercially viable product, and released it to the world.

Now, I see some of you have a pretty poor opinion of this. I think that's a bit short sighted, and somewhat prejudicial. Certainly at this point, Virtual Sex is a far cry from the "real" thing. That may not always be the case. (We're working on it! :-)
While there are many that may prefer the guiltless, on demand availability of Virtual Sex, most of you seem to think only the real thing is where it's at.
But stop a minute.......what about someone suffering from AIDS? Should they put a partner at risk? They certainly have needs, as any normal human does. What is your answer for quality of life for them? A machine is certainly not at risk. Virtual Sex for them is risk free, to everyone.
What about men suffering from Premature Ejaculation? How do we help them? Even the most loving partner can become tired of the treatment/training procedure for them. Again, the machine never gets tired, never gets exasperated, and certainly never has a headache.
How many times have you heard stories of unsatisfied sexual partners in a marriage? No one is at fault, it's just that people have different needs. Should the unsatisfied partner seek satisfaction outside the marriage? By cheating? Or might it be better if they could get their needs satisfied through the use of a machine. sexual satisfaction for everyone, without breaking their marriage vows.

So, as you ponder this, think beyond your own basic needs. I'll wager at least a few times in your life the idea of Virtual Sex may have tempted you,

Answer 3

I take "virtual" to mean "in place of."

Therefore I don't think sex is a good candidate for the virtual world. There would be no contact, no arousal, no rhythm, no orgasm. Virtual sex might be contemplation; which is OK, but unsatisfying.

In one of his early films, when he was still funny, Woody Allen devised an "orgasmatron." It was a pre-virtual virtual sex machine. You went into it, sat down (or stood up, I suppose) and got off. Didn't have to do anything or touch anything, you just got off in the orgasmatron. Didn't sound like much fun and that's probably why the idea went nowhere.

And probably why "virtual-sex" is a non-starter.

Answer 4

Someone actually came up with a virtual reality sex machine several years ago that had real promise, I thought. It's a full body suit with sensors. As the video of the actress did certain things, like touching you the sensors would put pressure on those areas, giving the sensation of a real person doing those things to your body. Must have been cost prohibitive, but sounded like a bitchin' idea for those cold Saturday nights. LOL

Answer 5

Doesn't virtual sex just equal masturbation while typing on messenger?
Or do you mean those weird virtual goggles that you wear?

Answer 6

After you try it then tell us because then you will know. How bout can a person have virtual sex if they are brain dead. I know that thought just popped up.

Answer 7

Yes

Answer 8

In most men, premature ejaculation occurs infrequently and isn't usually a cause for worry. However, if it occurs too often and ends up plaguing your sex life, it can very well be a cause for concern. Techniques to delay premature ejaculation https://tr.im/PFXSR
Studies have shown that premature ejaculation has a direct relationship with age. As men grow older and testosterone levels drop with age, premature ejaculation most likely sets in.

Answer 9

Rousseau had this problem already.

"Real" sex doesn't satisfy his fantasies.
The real is wrapped up ALREADY in the converse.

Then Derrida was like: "Il n'y a pas dehors la texte!"
and the world was never the same.

Answer 10

Not as enjoyable as real sex, so what would be the point?

Answer 11

Wouldn't it pretty much just be...kind of like reading erotica..?