I'm a Jewish person and I support the idea of a Jewish state. But I do not support the idea of a Jewish State in the Middle East any longer. I believe Israel should relocate. I know the Jews don't want to leave their holy places but for the sake of global world peace, would Israel relocating, say to someplace in North America, prevent violence around the world? Would Israelis ever see the big picture and get the hell out of the middle east?
2006-07-14 14:26:48 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They got the best piece of land there...why should they?
2006-07-14 14:30:01 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is why. Why should we leave our Holy places?
For the sake of world peace psh, you think that the Terrorists want that land?!!1 They want us driven into the sea, they have said it time and time again.
Don't abandon our people for political correctness, if you do not stand for our people, then who will?
God will, but so should you. You should also learn whats going on over there my brother, I have direct information from the homeland and the territories.
You think were fighting a war over land?
It's over our very existance, and always has been.
Relocate?
You would probably have all Americans relocate if the Spanish population and illigal immigrants began attacking us too eh?
Why should we leave our land? You should learn from our Fathers.
Our brothers are seeing the big picture, because they are right in the fire. It is you westerners who don't even know how the Eastern mindset thinks. Let alone what's going on over there or what should be done.
Westerners have no right to judge what's going on in the homeland.
God gave us that land, and that is the main reason we should not leave.
Take note: unlike many westerners, I have great love for our brothers both Israeli and Arab but not all Arabs, Muslims, Israelis, are terrorists, just as not all Germans were nazis.
2006-07-14 14:35:38 · answer #2 · answered by rambocommandodude 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I had a thought a few years ago - have the entire population of Israel relocate to a New Israel set up in Utah and/or Arizona - there is plenty of vacant land to go around, can grow olives and citrus, tomatoes, pursue small industry, etc. - Israel is not that large to begin with - 7000 square miles, smaller than New Jersey. Then if the Islamics get out of line - zap 'em hard with big-time weapons. End of all problems. With Israel in place as-is, nothing but more trouble forever. How about near Uvada, Utah?
A totally fresh start. Just a thought. And I like Israel.
2006-07-17 12:35:49 · answer #3 · answered by A-Bandit 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Amy, a relocation would probably save the world. I'd give the Jews southeast Texas between Corpus Christi and Houston.
Most people don't realize that the population of Israel is only around 5 million people which is about the size of an average state.
Let all of these brave wingnuts go to the middle-east and fight for their holyland. LOL
God bless you Amy. :-)
2006-07-14 14:40:29 · answer #4 · answered by noils 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you were a Jew you would know that Israel is your land, it is the land God gave to the Jews. Why should Israel just get up and relocate to make everybody happy? Come on that would never work besides that is the dumbest idea I have ever heard, just cave into terrorism and bolt. No, that is the Jews land and they have the right to live there just like every other person does Jew or non Jew.
2006-07-14 14:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by crash 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What if someone told you to move just because you were Jewish..I mean, out of your neighborhood. How would you feel? It is the same situation in Northern Ireland with the NRA...people have lived in these places all of their lives, and identify with them...it is their home. While I see your point...it would save lives, and that would be a good thing of course, but I think that people's sense of patriotism will prevent them from leaving, and I think that they will say that their home is worth dying for. That being said, I sincerely hope that there is a hurried end to the conflict, and religious tolerance will spread through the Middle East.
2006-07-14 14:57:24 · answer #6 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand your thought process, and it does have merit, but I doubt that it's realistic. Israelis today were not alive (for the most part) when their state was created, Muslims in the region today were not alive (for the most part) when Israel was founded. They have their homeland now, and they have pride and conviction for where they are. Just as we Americans have pride and conviction in our land today, that we acquired from the American Indians, France, Mexico, and England. They have no more right to that land then the Muslims, and the Muslims have no more right to that land then the Jews. While agree it would probably help world peace to relocate them short term, in the end, when it comes to an aggressor, there is no appeasement. We learned that leson from the late thirties when France and Great Brittan tried to appease Hitler. It doesn't work when you have an enemy that doesn't want your land, but to kill your way of life.
2006-07-14 14:37:14 · answer #7 · answered by Oilfield 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well relocation would be an option if the godly hand was played differently, but they feel they were given the land and i highy doubt that relocation is a peaceful option. It would only happen with force and more fighting. But the real question is can there be peace in the name of god.
2006-07-14 14:52:12 · answer #8 · answered by lifecircle9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And where you propose in North America should we place them? Do they have a choice in this matter? After All we are one nation under God here, and they may want to have their own state. If you think this would appease those lunatics over in the middle east you are sadly mistaken.
2006-07-14 14:34:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer your question: no. There is no way they would relocate due to the belief they are in the holy land right now. No matter if it settled peace with every other nation, they believe God gave them the land & will always be protected by God against those who are against them.
2006-07-14 14:31:54 · answer #10 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
you're being presumptuous. Neither the USA nor the european powers prolonged a hand interior the Jewish exodus to Palestine before or after the horrors those unlucky human beings have been made to circulate with the aid of as a consequence of Nazism and international conflict II. surely, the Jewish united states of america themselves desperate they are able to no longer wish for help from the West, so as that they helped themselves into the land of their ancestors. What got here approximately replace into that various the Western Allies, somewhat the British blockaded each attempt of the Jewish refugees to sail for their Promised Land. Boatloads of unarmed refugees have been summarily became away or grounded to adversarial shorelines with the aid of this naval blockade and 1000's extra died- this after having escaped the extermination camps of the Nazis. And whilst hostilities broke out between Palestinians and Jewish settlers, the British brazenly sided with the Palestinians. i'm no longer a Jew, nor do I supply my sympathies completely to them. we've additionally to contemplate the plight of the Palestinians and the super concern and lack of self assurance they could desire to have felt as further and extra of the as quickly as minority of their united states of america swelled in variety and challenge their carry of the land. the ensuing conflict, subsequently could desire to be seen alongside this easy. If this first conflict gave delivery to destiny wars interior the section, this could't be attributed to a West that delivered the Jews there. the middle East disaster resulted from a mishandling with the aid of the United international locations of the Palestinian question.
2016-11-02 02:10:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋