English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

911 probably would have happened, but would Gore have made better desisions and would we be in the mess we are in today?

2006-07-14 14:24:34 · 23 answers · asked by iknowtruthismine 7 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

23 answers

There's always a mess that we as Americans feel obligated to clean up. 9/11 would have occurred regardless of the administration. You are correct. Would we be in a different world, ABSOLUTELY!! I think if a tree won, we would be better off.

Remember, Al Gore DID WIN the 2000 election. Popular vote and electoral college. The Supreme Court shot it down.

2006-07-14 14:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 2 0

what do the dems continuously talk about those "bush tax cuts for the wealthy"? i keep in techniques getting a verify each and every 12 months from bush... and that i'm a ways from wealthy. i paid a lot less taxes and that i felt safer and lived extra constructive lower than bush. a similar won't be able to be reported for obama, who's always threatening to promote us out to china, or saudi arabia, or all people else who has designs on our u . s . a .. and obviously the country ought to were diverse now. the market ought to were offered down river 8 years in the past, instead of in simple terms now. we should be the greenest u . s . a . in the international, yet that would not count because china and india ought to nevertheless be generating a lot extra pollution than we do now in any case. there have been not in any respect surpluses. bill "double quarter pound-er with cheese" mcclinton siphoned money out of social protection and in the back of time table certain expenditures which gave the faux phantasm of a surplus. it wasn't until eventually the 1999 funds were finalized that we began to ascertain what became happening. by the point nov 2000 elections approached, the business equipment had already began sagging. bush hadn't even received yet and already you've been saying it became his fault. and shall we no longer even mind-set nationwide protection. al gore became the guy who sat at a chinese state dinner and allowed their overseas minister to call the U. S. a paper tiger. "it seems ferocious yet is surely overwhelmed in the hand."

2016-10-14 11:37:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nothing could be worse than what George Bush has done.
So even if you don't appreciate Al Gore, at least things would have been better if the Diebold machines had been accurate and Al Gore was sworn in as president.

2006-07-14 14:30:45 · answer #3 · answered by Big Red 2 · 1 0

No we would be in worse shape. He would have raised taxes which would hinder our economy and then would have signed the Kyoto Accord which would have us paying even more for gas than we do now. He would have done nothing but try appeasemnt with Osama after a token strike or two as Clinton did thus we would be subject to more terrorist attacks here as Al Qaeda would take that as sign of weakness. I could go on but I'm since you asked this question you in the way do did you probably don't really want opposing opinions like mine. But if I'm wrong I apologize. You can't blame everthing on Bush, Congress has ok'd almost everything he has done and they had the same intelligence reports and the ability to investigate deeper if they chose to.

2006-07-14 14:40:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes, we would have been better off if anybody had won but Bush, and who know's maybe Gore would have caught 9/11 before it happened, the intelligence was out there and ignored.

2006-07-14 14:29:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nobody would know. America wouldn't exist as we know it. Gore wouldn't have done anything and Bin Laden would be sitting in the Oval Office instead of hiding in some cave. Of course, some libs would prefer that.
Gore and Clinton had proven several times that "ignore them and they'll go away" doesn't work. Remember the Cole bombing and several embassies that were destroyed? NO reaction from Gore et al....

2006-07-14 14:32:19 · answer #6 · answered by LastNerveLost 3 · 0 1

Let's see. Mr. Gore would be more concerned about a fake global warming crisis than he would be in dealing with Islamic terorrists. 9/11 would have happened and like his Clinton, he would have shot a few cruise missiles into the Middle East and called it a day. We would have gotten attacked again.

All I want to say is: We were attacked directly or indirectly by Al-Qaeda in 7 major ways during Bill Clinton's presidency. Yet, he chose to do nothing about it. Enough said.

2006-07-14 14:32:02 · answer #7 · answered by TakingStock 3 · 1 1

We really don't know if 9-11 would have happened if Gore was in there and we would be breathing cleaner air and have extra change for that Dr Pepper.

2006-07-14 15:53:43 · answer #8 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 0 0

So you pretend to know what gore would do. If you are such the psychic why don't you share you little vision with us? The only mess we are in the one being created by the media. And you can't see it? Not much of a psychic are you.

2006-07-14 14:29:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We would be better off if Gore would fall over dead.

Since he couldn't ruin our country via the presidency, he has decided to try to ruin the world by making up man-made global warming. It doesn't exist, he distorted reams of data, and he knows it. It's shameful.

2006-07-14 14:28:17 · answer #10 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers