where it states any of these people are from Iraq. These were the 9/11 terrorists.
Mohammed Atta
* Marwan al-Shehhi (from the United Arab Emirates)
* Fayez Banihammad (from the United Arab Emirates)
* Mohand al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian)
* Hamza al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
* Ahmed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Marwan al-Shehhi is believed to have flown Flight 175 into the South Tower.
* Hani Hanjour (Saudi Arabian)
* Khalid al-Mihdhar (Saudi Arabian)
* Majed Moqed (Saudi Arabian)
* Nawaf al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
* Salem al-Hazmi (Saudi Arabian)
* Ziad Jarrah (Lebanese)
* Ahmed al-Haznawi (Saudi Arabian)
* Ahmed al-Nami (Saudi Arabian)
* Saeed al-Ghamdi (Saudi Arabian)
Ahmed al-Ghamdi, Saeed al-Ghamdi, Hamza al-Ghamdi, and Ahmad al-Haznawi came from three neighboring towns and belonged to the same tribe. Wail al-Shehri was
2006-07-14 13:20:04 · 9 answers · asked by butterfliesRfree 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
because there is a certain em_tech who says I need to stay off this part as I don't know what I'm talking about when I said none of the terrorists were from Iraq. Thank you.
2006-07-14 13:20:50 · update #1
Couple also trained in FLORIDA (where I live) so does that make FLORIDIANS TERRORISTS?
2006-07-14 13:31:21 · update #2
I am not arguing anything about Saddam. This guy told me that I was wrong and that these people were from Iraq. I am proving my point. I am not arguing about our war in Iraq because Saddam was evil.
2006-07-14 13:32:52 · update #3
no where,,, they were all terrorists,,, training in Afghanistan,,, with Osama bin laden,,,,,,,,,,,,
Hezbollah is financed by Iran
2006-07-14 13:24:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
A terrorist is someone who uses violence to intimidate another. We talk about terrorist.We talk about the war in iraq, but we have more than just a war in iraq. When a woman is raped, the rapist is a terrorist, inner city gangs are a form of terrorist, drug dealers, etc. Which is all the works of Satan. Satan is the leader or all terrorist. His mission is to seek, kill, and destroy all he can before the coming of the Lord. Even your own president is a terrorist, using weapons as an excuse to invade those people in iraq. I am still waiting to see where the weapons are. Now as for the question I have no knowledge where any are from, but if they do not stop with the violence I can tell you wher they are going.
For God told me in
St. Matthew 24:6
6) And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of war: see that ye be not troubled: for all these thing must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
My heart is set on God and his kingdom. I pray for you all. Amen
2006-07-14 14:16:45 · answer #2 · answered by Brother Marland H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Leo Girl has the correct answer here. No one debates that 9/11 did not involve Iraq but Iraq did sponsor terrorism.
My issue with your last statement "Because most people don't believe the war on terror should have been started in Iraq." is that we didn't start the war on terror in Iraq, we started it in Afghanistan. Iraq in my opinion was just the next logical place to go, partly because of the inherent dangers Iraq posed, but also to a great extent because of who its neighbors are.
The bulk of our military now flanks Iran and Syria. Do you really think this is by accident? Of course I always figured Iran would be next, but now that Syria has decided to declare war on Israel and fight on behalf of Hezbollah... well now I have to rethink that.
Syria may very well be on the verge of being the next terrorist state to feel the wrath. If you haven't noticed, you may want to take a closer look at what people are saying around the world. There is a slow but definite shifting going on throughout the world right now. This shift is leaning the world to oppose militant Islam on a global front. The gloves will be slowly taken off. We are at the doorstep of puring the world of a great evil. Once again America leads the way to save the free world.
2006-07-14 15:20:16 · answer #3 · answered by tm_tech32 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every single one of those people trained and lived in Iraq.
Making them....from Iraq, duh.
If someone is born in saudi arabia, then moves to Iraq and trains as a terrorist, it is completely misleading and irrational to complain that saudi arabia and not Iraq is the source of the terrorism.
Note that there is STRONG proof these guys came from Iraq in the form of translated documents and eye witness testimony. It's not even close to controversial any more.
2006-07-14 13:25:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be so narrow minded. Consider the possibility that terrorists not from Iraq could be trained and financed by Iraq.
Think that's unlikely? Hezbollah (not Iranians) and Hamas (not Iranians) are trained and financed by Iran. Think people. Just because John Kerry yells something doesn't mean it's true.
2006-07-14 13:24:12 · answer #5 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush tells us he has proof that the terrorist were supported by Iraq. Don't you believe our president? This proof is obviously secret and is kept in the file next to the Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
2006-07-14 13:32:46 · answer #6 · answered by kniggs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very good ....Now.....research the reason we are in Iraq. It sure as heck isn't the result of 9/11.
2006-07-14 13:25:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
youre from the south right?? just because they arent from iraq doesnt mean anything. we are not in iraq because of the terrorist
2006-07-14 13:25:25 · answer #8 · answered by jason 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THOSE terrorists were not from Iraq.
2006-07-14 13:23:13 · answer #9 · answered by salaamrashaad 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋