English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have mixed feelings about it.

2006-07-14 13:11:00 · 15 answers · asked by Cledus 1 in News & Events Other - News & Events

15 answers

Not guilty. There was a trial. it was on tv.

2006-07-14 13:13:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Guilty

2006-07-14 15:10:58 · answer #2 · answered by chet 5 · 0 0

If the detectives had no longer been so ******* racist and out to hold close a celebrity., they could have won a seek for warrant it is critical with the aid of making use of regulation, to pass the domicile of a suspect and seek for, plus do away with suggestions. i'm very plenty into crime & secret agent video clips, and with the aid of no potential in my life have I seen or learn a case the situation the entire criminal gadget, such because of the actuality the forensic group screwed up a case that allowed a murderer to stroll being got here upon "no longer in charge". (Why do you think of of all of them end their jobs and went into some element else??). I consistently believed that Oj, and his son dedicated the crime jointly. mutually as the call have been given right here down, to on the present time I bear in mind being on accountability in a well being middle (won't call), the situation an entire scale revolt broke out between the white scientific docs and the black scientific docs. (i'm speaking a precise fist wrestle). the only suitable public of black human beings felt he replaced into no longer quilty and the only suitable public of white human beings felt he replaced into intense high quality. my very own very own opinion everyone who had a hand indoors the proseution of Oj, Simson could want to be charged with first degree homicide X 2 for failing to do the activity that they took and function been paid to end. because of the actuality of those ********, 2 everyone seems to be ineffective and Oj, enjoys life being a unfastened guy. Minddoctor, France

2016-11-02 02:07:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Guilty!!! The fact that some jurors were too stupid to understand the DNA evidence does not make him innocent. The fact that there were jurors who felt that it was "payback time" and there was no way they would have convicted him, whatever evidence had been presented does not make him innocent.
By the way, how's the search for the real killer going?

2006-07-14 13:26:44 · answer #4 · answered by canucklehead1951 4 · 0 0

he was found not guilty but there are A LOT of people that feel he is guilty. I am one of them...

2006-07-14 13:14:37 · answer #5 · answered by chariot804 4 · 0 0

According to theJury not guilty.

2006-07-14 14:00:26 · answer #6 · answered by kara 5 · 0 0

Guilty, how many times do I have to say that.

2006-07-21 14:15:17 · answer #7 · answered by CottonPatch 7 · 0 0

Guilty.

For a full examination of the trial (and to convince you that he is), read Vincent Bugliosi's Outrage.

2006-07-14 13:14:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He did it. How else did Ron Goldman's blood get inside his Bronco? They never knew each other and had never had contact, other than that night. Besides, if O.J. is looking for the real killer, I don't think he's going to find him on the nearest golf course...

2006-07-15 10:10:20 · answer #9 · answered by correrafan 7 · 0 0

THE MAN WAS FOUND '' NOT GUILTY'' LET IT GO GET, OVER IT, AND GET ON WITH LIFE.

2006-07-14 13:17:40 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers