English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-14 12:37:25 · 9 answers · asked by tough as hell 3 in Politics & Government Government

When a leading psychologist like Harvard's Howard Gardner calls the president's science adviser a "prostitute," it's a safe bet that all is not well in the realm of government science policy. Indeed, in the past month, the United States has been engulfed by a kind of "science war," one pitting much of the nation's scientific community against the current administration. Led by twenty Nobel laureates, the scientists say Bush's government has systematically distorted and undermined scientific information in pursuit of political objectives. Examples include the suppression and censorship of reports on subjects like climate change and mercury pollution, the stacking of scientific advisory panels, and the suspicious removal of scientific information from government Web sites.

2006-07-14 13:05:26 · update #1

9 answers

Pretty consistent with this administration. We're still waiting for Cheney's Energy report.

2006-07-14 12:40:53 · answer #1 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0 0

It's not that strange. What are you saying, that Bush has invented some scientific machine that makes people vote for him? What is the scientific conspiracy that you hint at?

And it better not be about man-made global warming because that's the biggest pantload I've ever had the displeasure of reading all about so I could finally find the truth. Al Gore should be hung for treason. He's lying to the world - and he knows it!

2006-07-14 12:43:15 · answer #2 · answered by Farly the Seer 5 · 0 0

the reason human beings were given dissatisfied over Pastor Wright's comments isn't because of what he stated, yet because he's a black guy. Wow, enormous marvel, black each and every individual is pissed at being treated like 2d type voters. The white institution is petrified of solid willed those who communicate out adverse to the rules of racism and the status quo. this isn't an endorsement of Wright or Obama; i'm purely putting forward that the concept of a black guy who received't settle for an similar crap which has been exceeded out for years, is scary to the racist body it truly is u.s.. once you study the flaws those so-called pastors are putting forward, it truly is so disgusting i pick to vomit. no longer only are they attacking human beings of different religions, in spite of the indisputable fact that it truly is likewise unfavorable to Christianity. those top-wing chrisitians do not even understand what they're speaking about many of the time, as they make up issues and stats and attempt to call them info. Oh, right it truly is a sparkling reality, ninety 9.9 p.c. of religious conservatives pick to rape sons and daughters.

2016-12-06 11:48:56 · answer #3 · answered by grimwood 3 · 0 0

I don't think Bush knows how to read. So he wouldn't be able to tell if the adviser was revealing the truth to the American people through science.

But that's a silly concern because many American's are really bad at science, and reading, and anything requiring thought.

2006-07-14 12:41:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LOL .......strange???? My first thought was who and why would I care. More than likely he has a scientist that hates the press and the President is protecting him. That is more believable.

2006-07-14 12:41:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He is only allowed to do interviews when there is a full moon

2006-07-14 12:40:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they dont want us to know too much, everything might start falling apart, hahahahah

2006-07-14 12:40:02 · answer #7 · answered by blue_mist2002 2 · 0 0

Didn't know he had one. Who cares???

2006-07-14 12:41:26 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

is it???

2006-07-14 12:41:37 · answer #9 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers