English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.cdi.org/issues/wme/spendersfy...
Are we over compensating ? ...does America have a small penis ?????

2006-07-14 12:02:44 · 18 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

We are being told daily that you can not achieve anything by violence, but our government seems to act differently. Double standards or forked tongue?

America is NOT at war. WE HAVE INVADED IRAQ. A war would be if we take on N Korea, China, Russia. But we all know that won't happen.

2006-07-14 12:16:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I know this is way down the list but it's good

Yes world statistics show that American males do indeed have what is called genital demise. It is from the chemical dioctalthylate,(a first generation mutagen) commonly referred to as the garden hose taste.

Most plastics use it as an agent to provide flexibility. It off gasses into the (lets say cola beverage water etc) we drink it and it goes straight to the penis destroying the spoungaform tissue.

This is also called LDS and America has it and the blue pill won't fix it.

2006-07-14 19:46:28 · answer #2 · answered by 43 5 · 0 0

China has been spending TONS and TONS of money Mondernizing there Military for WHAT????? To retake Tiawane? Or to at some point take on the Big kid on the block? Either way at some point we will fight and you better PRAY we spend ALOT of money on weapons China has over 1 billion people they'd think Nothing of loosing a few million troops in a war.

2006-07-14 19:22:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually its a little less than twice as much as the next three. You get what you pay for. The CIA Factbook numbers match the congressional record for expenditures. Anyway the US is only third in per capita spending and 46th as a percentage of GDP. The cost of US weapons systems and manpower are consistant with their quality and I sleep well so I'm not complaining.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/mil_exp_dol_fig-military-expenditures-dollar-figure

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/mil_exp_dol_fig_percap-expenditures-dollar-figure-per-capita

2006-07-14 19:26:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Everything the others have said about tech costing a lot is true, but also don't forget that we won WWII by essentailly outspending the Germans.

Remember? Back in the day? Back in the day when Americans supported our military and made sacrifices for the war effort?

2006-07-14 19:10:33 · answer #5 · answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5 · 0 0

Keep in mind that not only do we spend money on defending ourselves, we spend loads of money defending others and on offensive strategies that really have nothing to do with our national security--it's not a matter of overcompsensating, it's a matter of desiring to the the major military force in the world and getting involved wherever we can.

2006-07-14 19:06:34 · answer #6 · answered by musikurt 4 · 0 0

And now you can see why everyone looks to us for help....because they can't defend themselves. Small Penis???? yeah that's why the US can take over any country it wants in less than 60 days.

2006-07-14 19:09:33 · answer #7 · answered by jpxc99 3 · 0 0

You get what you pay for: what other country has a capability to bring its army to any place in the world and topple the regime there?

2006-07-14 19:07:03 · answer #8 · answered by mityaj 3 · 0 0

Nope. The highest tech equipment costs alot.
Read more.

2006-07-14 19:06:28 · answer #9 · answered by Pancakes 7 · 0 0

you try fighting a war with a little money. We need the funds. And hey, they aren't targeted countries. Guess who is? [dee da dee!!]

2006-07-14 19:06:45 · answer #10 · answered by ellie_belle 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers