whats the max number of files to have in a folder?

Question

to not suffer in performance

i think some of u r wrong
when i open a folder with hunderds of files it takes forever to open but if it has less say 50 its much quicker

Answer 1

It all depends on your display setup. If you've got icon-caching disabled, it's going to go slowly. If you've got the Windows XP "Related Tasks" folder setup (The one that shows previews of pictures/audio clips), you're also going to suffer. Your best bet is to use the "List" Folder View. If you did that, you could likely have hundreds upon hundreds of files in the same directory and not see too much of a pause.

Answer 2

Files do not degrade performance the thing that does is when Windows saves data to the disk it may pit the parts of the file in different parts of the hard disk. When Windows opens the files it takes longer to load the data because it is not all in one place. So this make the performance of the computer suffer.

To fix this problem you need to defragment the hard disk so that all parts of that data are in one place and Windows does not take up as much time to load the data. So this makes the files not cause a performance decrease. Note that FAT16 and FAT32 drives get defragmented faster than NTFS. So NTFS has better performance on files.

Answer 3

no real answer
it takes memory when you open a folder
so the less in the folder the quicker it opens
assume you have one large folder containing a large amount of smaller files .
try putting some of these files in other folder's .
example i have a folder for music it contains 32 more folders each contains 38 < 50 mp3 files .
no problems accessing them. hope this helps

Answer 4

you can have as many as you like but as you have found out it takes a while for the main folder to open
to speed this up create other folders and transfer files of the same type into them ie it you have 20 letters to the bank put them in a new file called bank
it will make things easier to find

Answer 5

What are you talking about? How will having files in a folder make performance suffer? A little more details would be helpful.

Answer 6

It's not the number of files but the folder structure that can be a problem; ie creating too many sub-folders

Answer 7

If the info you take advantage of are a similar ones daily, you would possibly want to do this: Create a clean folder on your human being computer rename it something suitable like "Importan medical docs" or something "wide-spread medical docs" etc. click and carry the right mouse button down on it, then drag over to the starting up button, watch for the starting up menu to go back up, bypass as a lot as All courses (or courses on some setups), watch for that menu to strengthen, then as you're dragging up that record you would possibly want to get a horizontal bar appearing. At that aspect, let bypass of the right mouse button. somewhat menu might want to pop up - choose "bypass" next time you bypass to navigate for a rfile, click and carry the right mouse button on it, drag over to the starting up menu, up into your new folder, launch the right mouse button. yet another menu might want to pop up, yet this time with an selection to "create a shortcut right here". opt for this. Over the approach an afternoon you should have outfitted up countless the files you take advantage of many times in there. the earnings of it is that the shortcuts will continuously stay in there

Answer 8

there shouldnt really be a problem...if there is a problem it's showing all the icons. you can change that by right clicking and going to View then select "List".

huzzah!

Answer 9

varies with file sizes

Answer 10

fat32, about 4.1 million, but only 64K files (65534) in the root
NTFS, about 4.2 billion