2006-07-14 11:58:10 · 6 answers · asked by Giggly Giraffe 7 in Business & Finance ➔ Other - Business & Finance
Both are valid. . . Short and to the point to catch attention and give brief overview. (sometime that is all you need) I wouldn't give detailed information about something with out doing a quick overview as an intro. Then provide the detailed information that is going to be needed because people can't do their job or make effective decisions in ignorance.
2006-07-14 12:04:45 · answer #1 · answered by Gwen 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well it depends on who you are communicating to (level) and the stage of the process or project that you are communicating and the objective of this communication. It also depends on the culture of people you are communicating with.
This might confuse you more so as a general rule, "communicate the way that your messages will be understood" regardless of being short, brief or detailed. It is up to who you are communicating with. Not everyone has the same mental ability/experience.
Hope this will help
2006-07-18 10:15:26 · answer #2 · answered by balalika 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the Navy we had rules about the phones... the ABCs of phone communications....
Accuracy
Brevity
Clarity
Say what you mean, keep it short and annunciate your words to be understood. If you developed those habits, when there was a real emergency you could effectively communitcate... no time for B.Sing
2006-07-18 18:28:03 · answer #3 · answered by robertonduty 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Time is money. Your boss's time is worth more money than yours. So you need to spend your time determining how to consume as little of your boss's time as possible.
That is a major secret to promotion.
2006-07-14 19:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by Some Guy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-07-14 19:00:37 · answer #5 · answered by weather 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it should be brief and concise
2006-07-14 19:17:43 · answer #6 · answered by sheikaella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋