Obviously for president....
Please, no extreme comments are needed here...just answer seriously.
2006-07-14 11:31:10 · 18 answers · asked by Carolina Kitten 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No and I think it will be a mistake if she is the Dem's canidate. All stops will be pulled out to make sure she does not get elected. The latest polls show that Dem's have a good chance in midterm elections. The need to not waste their chances by backing Hillary for pres run at this time.
2006-07-14 11:35:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She would be an ineffectual president like Jimmy Carter. But for other reasons.
If the Reds loose a couple seats in Congress then a useless president might be good for 4 years to get everyone back on track.
2006-07-14 11:46:09 · answer #2 · answered by 43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no one. She'll under no circumstances get by potential of he primaries, her fellow democrats will eviscerate her with each and everything Kenneth Starr couldn't use adverse to bill Clinton because he became the sitting president. From White Water to Vince Foster's "suicide", the skeletons in her closet are stacked too extreme.
2016-12-06 11:45:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's a socialist and she's anti military. Those two things alone are good enough for me. You'll be seeing the other side be reported very very soon. It's all true. She's a vicious *****. Make no mistake about it, she wants to rule this nation, not lead.
2006-07-14 11:41:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a deep conservative, so the obvious answer is no. However, politics aside, how can anyone support a woman who can't stand up to her husband's dishonesty. This is what I don't get about liberal women. They support empowerment, but want to follow someone who is ultimately too week to tell her cheating husband where to go.
2006-07-14 11:36:05 · answer #5 · answered by AZ Ian 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually would not vote for her. I think that if she is as weak of a wife as she is, what kind of President would she make. Not that it even matters who votes for who, we didn't elect Bush, but he is the president.
I have become totally disillusioned.
2006-07-14 12:16:51 · answer #6 · answered by Chrissy: The Angry Typer a/k/a Mood Mole 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would, only if she is against a republican. I hope democrats will find better candidate, with clear record of resisting from the beginning the invasion into Iraq.
2006-07-14 21:02:52 · answer #7 · answered by Atheist 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would I wish she coulda ran against the idiot we have now. I think shed be a strong leader and a great first woman president
2006-07-14 11:49:31 · answer #8 · answered by stormyheart 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I sadly think most people would but not me. Why u may ask? Because she'll do evil things like Bill Clinton. Duh! But all Demo's and women because she is one will vote and that will be enough to get in The White House.
2006-07-14 11:37:15 · answer #9 · answered by TK 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the democrats are foolish enough to pick her...I'll vote for her. I do like her and think she's a smart lady, but I fear she can't win in the red states.
2006-07-14 11:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋