2006-07-14 10:00:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Stolen elections? As in recruiting dead people to vote, popping tires, and stealing computers from GOP offices? WOW..That sounds like the Democraps fascists!
2006-07-14 10:04:04 · update #1
HEY DUDE...
I AM A REPUBLICAN AND CONSERVATIVE.
EVEN I HAVE TO SAY ... YOU ARE OUT OF LINE.
2006-07-14 10:06:34 · answer #1 · answered by American Superman 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. For one thing, liberals have brains in their heads, that's why Bush has a problem controlling them. Second, "fascist" is an overused adjective. It literally means a political regime based on an overly-strong centralized government that exalts nation, state, and religion over individual rights, usually by violence. So he's really only 5/8 of a fascist, because he has yet to directly launch an attack on the American people yet, and our oversized government hasn't shown much strength since the republicans took over. The economy sucks unless your fortune 500 (in which case it's the best it's ever been, for them); emergency response dramatically slowed between 9/11 and Katrina, due to the beauracracy of the enourmous homeland security department; and we still can't find Osama Bin Laden or a Weapon of Mass Destruction (I know, I read the article about the empty aluminum tubes in that republican blog too. Did you notice that even Fox news didn't report that story? It's just not true); and both Iran and N.Korea are feeling tough enough to toe the line because of the bungling. Does that sound like a strong government to you? Still worth staying the course?
2006-07-14 10:02:55 · answer #2 · answered by Beardog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he is a fascist for stealing elections and violating the Constitution.
No- I mean computer voting systems that leave no papertrail and are desinged by Republican supporters. Machines that have been proven to be easily hackable, and have left a trail of errors that have always favored the Republican candidates.
2006-07-14 10:02:34 · answer #3 · answered by MrHanky 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's not a fascist and he is doing what he feels is right for the people of this nation. I haven't seen ANY liberals try and work out a peaceful solution with the extreme muslin terrorist. When peace loving folks have gone over there, they are captured and either killed or used as pawns. You think they would get a clue by now........I guess not though.........All whine and no solutions.....
2006-07-14 10:05:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He is not a fascist simply because a fascist has a theory that he backs and believes. Mr B is not that clever. Sorry!
2006-07-14 10:05:04 · answer #5 · answered by supersonikid 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Insurgents are those struggling with against the occupying stress of their u . s .. despite in case you call them freedom combatants or no longer, they're thoroughly distinctive than terrorists. Terrorists choose to attack different individuals exterior their u . s ., to reason concern and disrupt their enemies lives. Insurgents are struggling with against the occupying stress of their very very own u . s .. And one individual committing crimes does not provide somebody else a bypass. Killing harmless Iraqi civilians is basically as undesirable as killing harmless Serbian civilians. Attacking Christianity as an entire is basically as reprehensible and irrational as attacking Islam as an entire. And the few people who take place to be in the U. S. militia that dedicated crimes could get punished for their strikes. it relatively is not attacking the troops as an entire -- it relatively is conserving persons to blame for their strikes.
2016-10-07 22:27:41 · answer #6 · answered by greenwell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look up the meaning of the word, Hitler was a fascist.
2006-07-14 10:06:28 · answer #7 · answered by yankee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually, hes not a facist, just a dumb@$$ for violating the constitution, geneva convention rights, and stealing the 2000 election (dont deny it, fox news and jeb gave it to him).
2006-07-14 10:15:53 · answer #8 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, you really turn me on with this neo-con propaganda. I bet you'd like some good old fashioned man-lovin'. I'm here for ya.
2006-07-14 10:02:40 · answer #9 · answered by All that fancy paints as fair 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we prefer 'proto-fascist'. Hence the need for term limitations.
2006-07-14 10:04:19 · answer #10 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
amazing - and here I have been telling my children there are no dumb questions - then you come along and prove me wrong. how about you go play on the highway for a while
2006-07-14 10:02:55 · answer #11 · answered by JRob 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋