Will they scream bloody murder and demand a recount because Americans won't buy their appeasement and cowardice?
2006-07-14 09:59:02 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BTW, I love Ann Coulter.
2006-07-14 09:59:17 · update #1
u got it dude.
theyr just like babies- they cry when they dont get what they want.
2006-07-14 10:02:30 · answer #1 · answered by tmbrian_008 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Today's Fox News poll surely isn't a Democrat poll. The Fox News station is an arm of the White House and Republican spin. Today, they announced that Goerge Bush is back down to 36% approval rating. A 5% drop since Zarqowi was killed. You can have Ann Coulter. Ever notice her Adams apple. Girls don't have Adams apples. You can find out what she really is. You also mention that the Democrates are aligned with appeasement and cowardice. Talk about cowards all you have to do is look at all your yellow-bellied, chicken-sh*t cowards that haven't even served their country in the military, or used daddys connections to get out of combat situations, like yellow George W. You RepubliTARDs always slime military veterans. If we had to count on you guys fighting for America we'd all be in big trouble. By the way why is it that of over 70 Iraqi and Afghanistan verterans running for federal and state offices, only 3 are running as republicans and the rest are running as Democrates. that says a lot more than the bullsh*t you and your fellow RepubliTARDs are trying to put across by this stupid question.
2006-07-14 17:05:26 · answer #2 · answered by Pop D 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The exit polls said Gore won in '00 by about 1/2 of one percent, and he did. They said Kerry won Ohio by 1-2%, but for the first time in the history of the world, credible exit polls disagreed with an actual poll result. Kerry conceded because he thought the polls were just wrong.
RFK comes along and writes an article in Rolling Stone. Exit polls in 28 counties in Ohio were wrong, and 24 of the 28 skewed heavily in favor of Bush. Usually 1-2 counties are always off, but 28, with almost all of them having "errors" favoring Bush. 3 different statisticians (including one Republican, one moderate, and one liberal) ALL claim that the probability of all the exit polls being off in favor of one candidate, without the counts being rigged, between 1:900,000 and 1:1,200,000.
So, either we experienced the strangest statistical anomaly in the history of the world when it comes to elections, or the counts were rigged after the fact.
Given that the article goes on to talk about 9 major other things the Republican Secretary of State was illegally doing in Ohio, what do you think?
2006-07-14 17:23:37 · answer #3 · answered by yodasminion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey, our poll numbers wont be wrong because americans are ready for a change. even bushs pandering wont get his party the votes they need. and appeasement and cowardice....sounds like fear-mongering, like the kind of thing that bush did in the '04 election.
and btw anne coulter is a b**** and a liar.
2006-07-14 17:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the repubs will lose just a few seats but nothing as the dems are asserting.
2006-07-14 17:27:42 · answer #5 · answered by Rick 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't that just be the best election day ever! Boy, that would be fun! I wonder how they think whoever is going to "steal" that election!
2006-07-14 17:05:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares?
2006-07-14 17:02:27 · answer #7 · answered by askme 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably cry for a recount.....or hanging chads
2006-07-14 17:09:30 · answer #8 · answered by LetsParTee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would you like to play with my gun? I'll bet you would.
2006-07-14 17:06:16 · answer #9 · answered by All that fancy paints as fair 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋